The final paper topic is on forensic handwriting identification research. You can take one of two approaches with your paper: 1) a review of the research that has been conducted to support handwriting identification methods and theory including a review and commentary of the research that is still needed in the field; The paper needs to be double-spaced and include a minimum of 8 pages and a maximum of 15 pages in length (excluding cover page and reference page). The paper must include a minimum of five citations from scholarly sources (peer-reviewed journals or scholarly texts). The paper should be formatted in APA style with a cover page, reference page, and abstract.
Forensic handwriting identification is the process of using handwriting comparison techniques to determine whether two or more documents have been written by the same person. It has been used in court cases for centuries and continues to be an important tool in helping establish identity in criminal investigations.
Research into forensic handwriting identification has identified various methods for comparing writing samples such as examining letter formation, spatial relationships between letters, line slope and size of writing (Vigliotti et al., 2020). Additionally, many studies have explored how advances in technology can improve accuracy when performing comparisons such as automated approaches like machine learning algorithms (Hussain et al., 2016). However, these technologies need further refinement before they can be used reliably and confidently and more research needs to be conducted in this area.
Further research is also needed on how human characteristics affect handwriting style such as age, gender, nationality etc. The current evidence base suggests that there are differences between individual’s writing styles however it is unclear if these are statistically significant or if they would hold up to scientific scrutiny under court proceedings (Hyland et al., 2018). Additionally, further work should focus on developing better methods for assessing reliability of conclusions drawn from comparisons that take into account potential bias from investigators.
Overall, it is clear that although much progress has been made through research conducted so far within the field of forensic handwriting identification there remain several areas where further investigation is needed before reliable assessments of authorship can be established with confidence.
at times supplanted by a quick n-bit convey spread viper. A n by n exhibit multiplier requires n2 AND doors, n half adders, and n2 , 2n full adders. The Variable Correction Truncated Multiplication technique gives a proficient strategy to re-ducing the power dissemination and equipment necessities of adjusted exhibit multipliers. With this strategy, the diagonals that produce the t = n , k least critical item pieces are disposed of. To make up for this, the AND doors that create the halfway items for section t , 1 are utilized as contributions to the changed adders in segment t. Since the k excess changed full adders on the right-hand-side of the cluster don’t have to create item bits, they are supplanted by adjusted decreased full adders (RFAs), which produce a convey, yet don’t deliver a total. To add the consistent that revises for adjusting mistake, k , 1 of the MHAs in the second column of the exhibit are changed to altered concentrated half adders (SHAs). SHAs are identical to MFAs that have an informat