Students with disabilities report special challenges in making a successful transition from two-to four-year schools. Their top concerns are: differences in disabled student services; inadequate financial support; personal/family issues; and differences in academic requirements. Professionals who work with postsecondary students with disabilities report the following range of challenges students with disabilities encounter that negatively impact successful transition to four-year schools: poor study skills; inadequate self-advocacy skills; lack of mentors with disabilities; differences in disabled student services; financial support; and differences in academic requirements. It can be very challenging to manage difficult students in a special education classroom. Parents who have children with disabilities are at times alienated by the community as they are perceived to be curse carriers who gave birth to cursed children.
He makes sense of this by contending that each of the activities of the ruler (counting those unreasonable to a specific individual) were approved, yet co-composed by people in general with the foundation of the common agreement and the production of the district. Yet again this confirms the responsibility of individuals to the top of the leviathan’s activities, and accordingly their capacity to “live by their own regulations” (Machiavelli, 20).
One more part of the Leviathan that makes it a republic, is the way that the sovereign is intended to address individuals. This is evident in the text when Hobbes states,
“lessen every one of their wills, by plurality* of voices, unto one will, which is as a lot to say, to designate one man or gathering of men to bear their individual, and each one to possess and recognize himself to be creator of at all he that so beareth their individual will act*” (Hobbes, pg.109, s.13).
As the sovereign is intended to be a delegate of individuals, he should act (or pass regulations) lined up with individuals’ needs and needs. In this way the public’s will and need frequently centered around the security of the people, direct what sort of regulations the republic will have. Essentially, the sovereign’s obligation to address the majority is talked about when Hobbes states,
“whosoever beareth the individual individuals, or is one of that gathering that bears it, beareth additionally his own normal individual” (Hobbes, pg.120, s.4).
In this statement, Hobbes certifies the mankind of the sovereign and albeit this might attract him to his confidential advantages, it additionally considers the ruler to be know about the normal adaptation of the majority (vicious demise on account of another person). Consequently such humankind considers an exact portrayal of individuals by the sovereign who is then ready to fill his need, and pass regulations that are affected by the desire of the larger part.
However generally Hobbes was viewed as a devoted traditionalist, when one considers the conservative hints of his work, Hobbesian Leviathan is both a republic and a territory, as the common agreement that established this political substance, requires the portrayal of his subjects by a flat out ruler and makes him responsible for the help and insurance of his kin. Because of this responsibility and portrayal, the regulation of the ruler or the top of the Leviathan should be lined up with the will and right of his creators (individuals), making it a standard by a larger number of people.
