Abraham Finds Himself In A Situation Not Entirely Different From Laius, The Father Of Oedipus.

Sample Solution

Readers of the Book of Genesis are meant to learn a different lesson about Abraham’s story compared to that of Laius and Oedipus. The central message conveyed in Abraham and Isaac is that if Abraham chooses to obey God, he will be rewarded with his son's life being spared. Additionally, this narrative serves as an affirmation of the power of one true god over other religions (Miles 2010). As opposed to pagan religions or pre-Abrahamic faiths which believed in multiple gods who sometimes gave warnings or instructions that were unreliable, this story asserts the reliability and faithfulness of a singular monotheistic God (Genesis 22:1-19). Moreover, it highlights how obedience is essential for showing devotion towards God; thus demonstrating how His power reigns supreme and should not be challenged (Helyer & Erwin 2007). In comparison, Laius’s warning from Apollo turns out to be false because his son Oedipus doesn't end up killing him as prophesied. This demonstrates how putting trust into mere mortals rather than listening directly to what a higher authority has instructed can lead to disaster (Sophocles 493 BC). Furthermore, while Oedipus ultimately pays for a crime he was unaware of committing due to being misled by these same mortals – namely Tiresias who was trying protect Laius – due to their lack credibility readers understand that divine retribution isn't always deserved (Sophocles 493 BC). Overall then, the stories between Abraham and Isaac versus Laiuas and Oedipus offer different lessons regarding religious beliefs. While Abraham showcases unequivocal faith rewarded through obedience towards one true God; Sophocles' play highlights why it is important not rely on unreliable sources when making decisions.

tion in the future. This highlights that student motivation is both a cause and a consequence. This assertion that engagement can cause changes motivation is embedded on the idea that students can take actions to meet their own psychological needs and enhance the quality of their motivation. Further, Reeve, J. (2012) asserts that students can be and are architects of their own motivation, at least to the extent that they can be architects of their own course-related behavioral, emotional, cognitive, and agentic engagement.

Synchronous and Asynchronous Learning

The COVID-19 pandemic brought a great disaster on the education system around the world. Schools have struggled due to the situation in which led them to cessation of classes for an extended period of time and other restrictive measures that later on impede the continuance of face-to face classes. In consequence, there is a massive change towards the educational system around the world while educational institutions strive and put their best efforts to resolve the situation. Many schools had addressed the risks and challenges in continuing education amidst the crisis by shifting conventional or traditional learning into distance learning. Distance learning is a form of education through the support of technology that is conducted beyond physical space and time (Papadopulou, 2020). Distance learning is an online education that provides opportunities towards educational advancement and learning development among learners worldwide. In order to sustain the educational goal of our country, distance learning is a new way of providing quality education as much as possible among public and private institutions especially to those pursing in higher education. The instructional delivery in considering distance education can be through synchronous or asynchronous mode of learning, in which students can engage and continually attain quality education despite of the pandemic situation. Based on the definition of Easy LMS Company (2020), synchronous learning refers to a learning event in which a group of participants is engaged in learning at the same time (e.g., zoom meeting, web conference, real- time class) while asynchronous learning refers to the opposite, in which the instructor, the learner, and other participants are not engaged in the learning process at the same time. Thus, there is no real-time interaction with other people (e.g., pre-recorded discussions, self- paced learning, discussion boards). According to article issued by University of Waterloo (2020), synchronous learning is a form of learning that is live presentation which allows the students to ask questions while asynchronous can be a recorded presentation that allows students to have time in reflecting before asking questions. Synchronous learning is a