Acts 11:22-30
Read Acts 11:22-30; then 12:25 -14:28. Also read Bruce, pages 126-147, and 160-172. Consult a map of Paul’s First Missionary Journey and memorize the key cities in order.
Then answer the following questions (four pages).
1. What is significant about the city of Antioch in Syria?
2. Describe the leadership of the church that emerged in Antioch, and explain how Barnabas and Paul came to be missionaries?
3. Who was John Mark? Tell everything you can discover about him.
4. Summarize their encounter with bar-Jesus on Cyprus.
5. Summarize Paul’s sermon in the synagogue of Pisidian Antioch.
6. Explain what happened in Lystra. Who opposed Paul, and how did it end?
7. When arriving in a new city, Paul typically began by visiting the local Jewish synagogue and preaching there. Explain why he would do that.
his prompts question of what meets all requirements to be a soldier, and whether it is legitimate to kill each other as warriors. Soldiers are individuals who are involved straightforwardly or by implication with the conflict and it is legal to kill 'to protect the blameless from hurt… rebuff wrongdoers (Begby et al (2006b), Page 290).However, as referenced above non military personnel can't be hurt, showing soldiers as the main genuine focuses on, one more state of jus in bello, as 'we may not utilize the sword against the people who have not hurt us (Begby et al (2006b), Page 314).' likewise, Frowe recommended warriors should be distinguished as warriors, to keep away from the presence of close quarters combat which can wind up in a higher passing count, for instance, the Vietnam War. Additionally, he contended they should be essential for the military, remain battle ready and apply to the guidelines of jus in bello. (Frowe (2011), Page 101-3). This proposes Frowe looks for a fair, simply battle between two members keeping away from non-warrior passings, yet couldn't this prompt higher demise rate for soldiers, as the two sides have generally equivalent opportunity to win since both utilize comparable strategies? By the by, seemingly Frowe will contend that soldier can legitimately kill one another, showing this is simply, which is likewise upheld by Vittola, who states: 'it is legal to draw the sword and use it against villains (Begby et al (2006b), Page 309).' furthermore, Vittola communicates the degree of military strategies utilized, however never arrives at a resolution regardless of whether it's legal to continue these activities, as he continually tracked down a center ground, where it very well may be legitimate to do things like this yet never consistently (Begby et al (2006b), Page 326-31). This is upheld by Frowe, who estimates the authentic strategies as per proportionality and military need. It relies upon the size of how much harm done to each other, to pass judgment on the activities after a conflict. For instance, one can't just nuke the psychological militant gatherings all through the center east, since it isn't just corresponding, it will harm the entire populace, an unseen side-effect. All the more critically, the troopers should have the right aim in the thing they will accomplish, forfeiting the expenses for their activities. For instance: to execute all detainees of war, they should do it for the right expectation and for a noble motivation, relative to the damage done to them. This is upheld by Vittola: 'not generally legal to execute all warriors… we should consider… size of the injury caused by the foe.' This is additionally upheld by Frowe approach, which is much more upright than Vittola's view however suggests similar plans: 'can't be rebuffed just for battling.' This implies one can't just rebuff another in light of the fact that they have been a soldier. They should be treated as others consciously as could be expected. Be that as it may, the circumstance is heightened in the event that killing them can prompt harmony and security, inside the interests, all things considered. Generally, jus in bello recommends in wars, mischief must be utilized against warriors, never against the blameless. In any case, eventually, the point is to lay out harmony and security inside the federation. As Vittola's decision: 'the quest for equity for which he battles and the guard of his country' is the thing countries ought to be battling for in wars (Begby et al (2006b), Page 332). Subsequently, albeit the present world has
Sample Solution
Antioch in Syria is significant as it was the site of the first Christian mission outside Palestine. The city had a large number of Gentiles who were living among Jews, and this allowed for an easy transition into spreading Christianity to non-Jewish people (Bruce, 126). It is also believed that Antioch was the birthplace of the term “Christian” which was used to describe members of the new faith (Bruce, 127).
The church leadership in Antioch consisted mostly of Hellenists who were expelled from Jerusalem during a period of persecution by King Herod Agrippa I (Acts 11:19-20; Bruce, 126). As their synagogue services had been disrupted due to persecution, many Hellenists sought solace with other gentile followers in Antioch (Bruce 160-172). This led to an increase in believers and Barnabas being sent from Jerusalem to encourage them in their faith. After Barnabas’ arrival he recruited Saul (Paul), another follower from Tarsus, and together they began a mission amongst those living outside Palestine (Acts 11:22-30; Bruce 126) . This resulted in Paul travelling on his first mission journey around parts of Asia Minor before returning to Jericho where Barnabas rejoined him after visiting Cyprus.
Through these missions followers experienced increased growth and conversions which solidified Christianity as an all inclusive religion no longer confined within Jewish boundaries but open for anyone regardless of race or gender. Thus Antioch played a key role as a major hub for early Christian missionary work and provided an opportunity for Barnabas and Paul to become missionaries.