Administrative investigation on administrative officer

 

You are an administrative officer in a criminal justice agency, and a citizen calls you up to complain that one of your officers destroyed evidence instead of collecting it and impounding it into the evidence room. The agency has a policy that all evidence is to be impounded (seized) and transported to the evidence room. Additionally, state law prohibits the destruction of evidence.
Scenario
A coffee shop manager found a baggie of marijuana and a vial of hash oil that was left in the public rest room. The manager called your agency, and an officer was dispatched to the shop. The officer interviewed the manager and then explained to him that it was impossible to determine who the owner of the drugs is and that no charges could ever be pressed. Subsequently, the officer suggested that it would be best to flush the marijuana down the toilet and drain the hash oil down the sink. The manager agreed to the officer’s terms, and the officer instructed the manager to destroy the evidence. The manager destroyed the evidence in the presence of the officer.
Interview
You summon the officer into your office and ask him what happened. The officer explained that the manager agreed to destroy the evidence and that the officer made sure that he never personally touched it or destroyed it. The officer said that it would have been a waste of time to inventory the drugs, and do all of the paperwork, and transport the drugs to the evidence room downtown.
Begin your research by doing a Google search of the term chain of custody, and then answer the following questions in a 3-4-page paper:
• Should an administrative investigation be conducted to determine if the officer violated any agency policies or state laws? Why or why not? • If the owner of the drugs is unknown and if no charges can be pressed for possession of drugs, is it genuinely a destruction of evidence case? • Was the officer ethically or legally obligated to impound the drugs, or was officer discretion more appropriate to determine if the drugs should be destroyed on the spot? • If identified drugs are not fully accounted for by officers by inventorying them and then impounding them, then is it possible for the drugs to be illegally used or resold on the black market? o Why do agencies have policies for impounding evidence? • What does the public expect in a case like this?

Sample Solution

secrecy, security and privacy. The BPS rules frame what is expected of scientists as far as morals while directing mental exploration as there is an ethical obligation to safeguard research members from hurt. These rules incorporate; double dealing, informed assent, interviewing, right to security, privacy, to stay away from pressure and damage and the right to withdrawal whenever.

 

Withdrawal is the concurred decide that a member might pull out from a trial whenever, this incorporates currently gathered information from the member. They ought to be told from the very start that they h

 

Unique

Is the successive utilization of realistic symbolism in traditional press causing the end of shock promoting? Does it never again leave us staggered? In any case, I accept this technique is as yet powerful in catching the watcher’s consideration. Yet again in this Dissertation, I will talk about the progressions expected to make it flourish. These focuses will be accumulated from sources, for example, books, sites and articles zeroing in on shock strategies. I will exclusively utilize optional examination to look at human brain science and the impacts of shock to uncover what compels it work. This will go with contextual analyses of shock adverts, making the statements proposed all through this conversation. This examination will assist the promoting business and myself with creating shock strategies that will spellbind the crowd of the 21st hundred years.

 

Presentation

‘A work of art that doesn’t surprise does not merit painting’ (Duchamp, 2002; 69), is an understanding that I accept implies it is useless to plan something in the event that it doesn’t get the ideal responses as well as result. To this end shock promoting at this flow specific moment is as of now not substantial or worth utilizing.

 

Shock strategies are techniques utilized in promoting fully intent on grabbing the eye of their crowd (The Guardian, 2008). Be that as it may, in spite of its viability previously, its ability to stun has debilitated during this ongoing ten years and no longer makes the response or achievement it once did. What has caused its downfall and is there a way back from this?

 

The proof I will use all through this Dissertation will be obtained from books, sites, blog entries and articles zeroing in regarding the matter of shock promoting and the brain research of the human psyche which will be talked about later exhaustively. I won’t utilize essential examination, as it won’t be applicable to demonstrate my contention or legitimize my focuses. My optional examination will comprise of information, examinations and contextual analyses that I have assembled from various sources. Each of the cases studies and watchers I will examine will be from nations that fundamentally communicate in English, like the United Kingdom and the United States of America. This study won’t address or be supporting some other nations because of their differential societies, convictions and regulations.

 

I will begin with the short history of shock promoting and why it was a fundamental strategy when it was first settled; continuing on toward how the change in media and the movement of watchers has debilitated the effect of shock. I will advance focuses alongside proof on what necessities evolving. To legitimize this, I will introduce three contextual analyses zeroing in on various subjects like smoking, driving and mindfulness. For each situation study, there will be one model which is effective, while the other is fruitless.

 

The exploration I have gathered will assist with assessing what changes are required for shock promoting to become viable once more. As well as perceiving the significance of brain science in the promoting business, as there is something else to stunning the watcher besides showing them an upsetting picture.

 

The reason for this Dissertation will be fundamental for

This question has been answered.

Get Answer