Part 1
Write what the 3 differential diagnoses are 150-to-200-word count. Taking into account the patient case study below.
1) Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD)
2) Alcohol Intoxication (AI)
3) Alcohol Withdraw (AW)
Case study: AC. is a 44 y/o Asian female on an intervention psychiatric evaluation secondary to suspected substance use disorder as requested by the school principal where she is currently employed. The school principal asked that the EAP therapist intervene and assess the patient due to several complaints from students and parents suggesting that the patient seemed intoxicated and impaired while at work. The patient appears irritable, easily agitated, defensive and denies appears to be in denial. During the assessment, the patient requested to leave the section several times, stating, “I am missing class right now, and I can do this in my third period while I am on my break. According to the school principal, the patient has missed work at school twenty-two times this year. She feels the students are disrespectful and out to get her and the school is taking their side. The patient denies having any substance use issues, although she later admitted drinking five to six glasses of wine and a couple of drinks every night. Furthermore, she believes that it takes her more alcoholic beverages than what the average person would consume to become intoxicated. She also admits to at times having blackout spells when misusing alcohol. As a results to her alcohol use, she is divorced and lost the custody of her four-year-old child. The patient current job is at jeopardy if she does not comply with the psychiatric evaluation.
Part 2
Reflection notes: What would you do differently with this client if you could conduct the session over? Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).
Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a medical condition characterized by an impaired ability to stop or control alcohol use despite adverse social, occupational, or health consequences. It encompasses the conditions that some people refer to as alcohol abuse, alcohol dependence, alcohol addiction, and the colloquial term, alcoholism. Intoxication is the point at which alcohol depresses the central nervous system so that mood and physical and mental abilities are noticeably changed. The legal definition of intoxication is a Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) of .08. Alcohol withdrawal is a set of symptoms that can occur following a reduction in alcohol use after a period of excessive use.
regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi
regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi