American history

What is the significance of this document for understanding America at the beginning of the 19th Century?
Why does Tecumseh believe that U.S. policies toward Native Americans are flawed?
What does Tecumseh believe that Native Americans should do to protect tribes that inhabit North America?
What does Tecumseh’s letter tell us about Native American resistance?
Discuss the relationship of Tecumseh’s letter to the letter from Thomas Jefferson to William Henry Harrison regarding policies toward the Native Americans. How does Jefferson’s letter influence your interpretation of Tecumseh’s plan for resistance?

Sample Solution

The history of the United States is what happened in the past in the United States, a country in North America. They won the Revolutionary War and started a new country. They signed the constitution in 1787 and the Bill of Rights in 1791 (Boyd 2017). With a fervor born of desperation

oreover, the absence of control gatherings of certain examinations is grievous, as control bunches are fundamental for correlation.

Over the confinements of the investigations talked about, the writing audit itself has a few constraints too. Most importantly, some writing talked about could be viewed as rather obsolete. Authority is a powerful research field that is continually changing, consequently writing that is later is vital. Notwithstanding, this could likewise be viewed as a quality as it is additionally critical to take a gander at the master plan, for which more seasoned writing is fundamental. Furthermore, not all important writing was perused and talked about. Articles and studies were chosen dependent on obvious pertinence, nonetheless, all things considered, some significant data and studies are absent from the audit.

A portion of the writing examined concentrated more on the sexual orientation of the pioneer, other on the sex of the subordinate, and other on both. There were additionally papers that didn’t obviously recognize pioneer and subordinate sexual orientation. Most examinations talked about female-male, female-female, and male-male dyadic relationship without unequivocally investigating the job of the subjects. It is conceivable that, for instance, a female chief male subordinate relationship contrasts fundamentally from a female subordinate-male pioneer relationship. Future research should look more into both subordinate and pioneer sexual orientation, and whether these impact dyadic connections in an unexpected way.

A significant advance that must be made by future specialists is the improvement of study plan. All the impediments talked about above are to be considered and managed. This implies longitudinal investigations ought to be directed, with bigger and increasingly generalizable examples, including control gatherings.


All in all, look into shows that sexual orientation doesn’t assume a directing job in the connection among OCB and LMX. Besides, discoveries on the job of pioneer as well as su