Compose an argumentative essay about polarization and empathy, focused specifically on ways to get along at the present time. This essay is expected to state a central idea about polarization and empathy, focused specifically on ways to get along at the present time, as a thesis, followed by convincing reasons (stated as topic sentences) and compelling examples, including the successful implementation of several Critical Thinking techniques, all supporting the central idea in a series of well-developed supporting paragraphs.
Thesis Statement: Polarization can be addressed through Critical Thinking techniques that foster understanding and empathy, enabling us to get along at the present time.
In today’s society, polarization is a pervasive issue that seeks to divide us. It can manifest in different forms such as political feuds or disputes between groups of people. However, there are methods we can use to overcome it, especially if we are willing to employ Critical Thinking techniques. By developing our ability to think critically and analyze arguments objectively without judging in advance, we can gain an unbiased perspective which will ultimately lead us towards more mutual understanding and empathy between conflicting parties.
For instance, consider an example of two individuals engaged in a political debate about healthcare reform. Applying Critical Thinking tools such as reflective listening (Gibbs 2018) could help them understand each other’s views better by allowing each individual to explain their opinion openly before presenting any counterarguments. This type of discussion builds mutual respect between both participants and prevents escalation into hostility or aggression since they are free from judgmental thinking when expressing themselves freely (Langford 2019). Moreover, this process also encourages critical evaluation of facts rather than relying on opinions alone—a key factor for productive dialogue (Belanger 2020). In this way, all parties involved have the opportunity to recognize different perspectives and combine them together for the common good instead of remaining divided over polarizing issues.
Overall, polarization is a problem that affects many aspects of our lives today but there is hope if we are willing take initiative by practicing effective Critical Thinking skills that prioritize understanding and empathy above all else so we can get along peacefully with one another regardless of differences in opinion or backgrounds at the present time.
With Love, Revenge
Retribution isn’t an actual existence however a subject principally including show and different books. Subsequently, the most ideal approach to investigate retribution is to once in a while check the story close by. As a dramatization, the awfulness of retribution is principally character – driven, the intention of the character is straightforward: retaliation – under the name of adoration. Bel-imperia is looking for retribution on her darling, Andre. The thought process speaks to a cozy connection between certainty of misfortune and vengeance and love.
The subject of affection and retribution in Shakespeare’s “Hamlet’s Love” is one of Hamlet’s most remarkable topics, however one preferred position – the intensity of vengeance advances Hamlet’s adoration. I will vindicate the homicide of his dad. While Hamlet was befuddled, he discovered that his mom got hitched to his uncle not long after his dad kicked the bucket. Despite the fact that he didn’t question the sudden passing of his dad soon he was as yet stunned. As Kenneth Muir stated, “He (Hamlet) was stunned by Gertrude.
Retribution is want for vengeance and fairness. At the point when the individual you love gets injured, that nature will vindicate. In any case, inaccurate conduct of these counter can prompt genuine results. In the awfulness of William Shakespeare ‘Hamlet’, Fortinbras, Hamlet, Lertes demonstrated that their craving for retribution unavoidably prompts misfortune. By losing somebody you love, Hamlet ‘s job has made it conceivable to make a move. The youthful Fortinbras established a military to restore the land lost by his dad to Hamlet and the lord.
Both Hamlet and Leltus added to the vengeance of the showy topic. Both of these characters love their dad definitely. That is the reason they are delivering retribution. Be that as it may, their adoration is misshaped, and now they want to fight back against the passing of their dads. Be that as it may, they treat it in different ways. Hamlet realized who murdered his dad, yet he didn’t make a move right away. Rarthes was somewhat indistinct, which was the reason for his dad’s passing, yet he quickly acted to vindicate him. “For heck, unwaveringness! Promise,
Retribution is the topic of this film. We saw this when Sook-hee promised to vindicate her dad’s passing, her better half, and her retribution once more. Retribution is the explanation behind acquainting her with the universe of Assassin and helping her accomplish her objectives. It has become an endless loop of her. In some cases I see it influences her, however this is by all accounts the best thing knowing how Sook-hee does. She is carrying on a “typical” life and decided to render retribution while strolling. Despite the fact that it appears to be a toy of her destiny, Sook-hee settles on his own choice