Procedure: Choose a well-established news source. Select an op-ed piece or argumentative article from within the last eight weeks. Important: Do not select a straight news article or one that appears mostly informative. (How do you tell the difference? See below.) You will be analyzing the argument of the article you select in Week 3.

Write a 150- to 250-word summary of the article. Your summary should include an overview of the article’s purpose and enough information that someone who has not read the article would have a clear and concise understanding of what the piece is about. You will have to make some choices about what reasons, details, and examples to include in your summary. However, your goal is to represent the gist of the article as clearly and accurately as possible. Do not include your opinion of the article or its topic. Do not editorialize (“This is a well-written article”).

Your summary must adhere to the following guidelines:

Introduce the source by title and author within the first few sentences of your summary.

Include a few direct quotations.

All quotations and paraphrases must be cited in APA Style.

Write in third person. Do not refer to yourself in the summary.

Include an APA-Style References page.

Proofread carefully so your summary contains few or no mechanical errors.

Format: One paragraph (two, at most), with an introduction, body, and conclusion.

Format the assignment in APA Style: one-inch margins, page numbers at the top right, 12-pt. Times New Roman font, running heads, and title page.

Submitting the assignment: Attach your essay as a single file Word document or .pdf file and submit to the W2 assignment drop box.

Is it News or is it an Argument?

A common mistake students make in this assignment is selecting a news article to summarize instead of an argument or opinion piece. It’s important to distinguish between two types of writing: informative and argument. Even if an article addresses a controversial topic, such as gun control, the author may not take a position. He or she may be reporting on recent developments of a particular piece of legislation or on what a political figure has said. In general, an article in a news source does one or the other–report or argue–not both.

How do you tell the difference between arguing and reporting? Sometimes the title of the article can give away the author’s claim. One article selected by a student for this assignment contains this title: “Health Care is a Human Right. It’s Time for a Public Option” (Schneider, 2019). That’s a clear statement of the author’s point of view.

Another way is to look for a thesis statement—one or two sentences which clearly express a point of view. At the end of the same article, we find these words: “A public option will bolster competition, help control skyrocketing costs, and give patients more choices. It is time for action.” (Schneider, 2019, para. 7). These sentences crystallize the point of view—what the author is trying to convince you, the reader, to agree with. (Usually, a thesis statement is found at the end of the introduction, but sometimes it can be found later. In most essays, however, the conclusion reaffirms the author’s main point.)

If you have trouble finding the author’s point of view—or if positions are expressed solely by people interviewed in the article (not by the author)—you probably have a news report instead of an argument.

English Composition II – Week 3 Assignment

Analyzing a Written Rhetorical Text

Purpose of assignment: To analyze the rhetoric of an op-ed or argumentative piece.

Procedure: Last week, you selected an argumentative article from a well-known news source to summarize. This week, you will write a rhetorical analysis of the same article. Your rhetorical analysis should address the following questions (from Chapter 3 of your textbook):

•What is the main point? How does the author support this point or make it convincing? How do these attempts to support the point further the author’s purpose?

•What sort of character (ethos) does the author create through the text? What are all the ways the author uses to build credibility? How do these attempts to build credibility further the author’s purpose?

•How does the author appeal to the audience’s emotions (pathos)? What are the emotions? How do these emotional appeals further his or her purpose?

•Does the author appeal to the reader’s logic (logos) or timeliness (kairos)? How? How do these appeals further his or her purpose?

•What tone or style does the author use? Is the language formal or informal? What do you notice about word choice and the arrangement of ideas? Are certain words repeated? What effect does this tone and style create? How does it further his or her purpose?

Your analysis must adhere to the following guidelines:

1.Introduce the source by title and author early in your paper.

2.Include a brief summary of the article.

3.Include examples, quotations, and paraphrases from the article to support your points.

4.All quotations, paraphrases, and summaries must be cited in APA Style.

5.Write in third person. Do not refer to yourself in the paper.

6.Include an APA Style References page.

7.Proofread carefully so your summary contains few or no mechanical errors.