Analyzing Your State Senate District

 

OBJECTIVE: This assignment has two key purposes: 1) for the student to identify and analyze their state senate district; 2) for the student to think critically about their state senator (culturally and ideologically). Translation: you are demonstrating your capacity to understand your community (senate district) and assess the quality of representation.

BACKGROUND: One of the most important facets of a representative democracy is—unsurprisingly—REPRESENTATION. This assignment builds on a few key concepts related to the idea of representation—who represents us and how are we represented. In particular, we are building on the ideas of descriptive representation and substantive representation. Here’s what these mean:

Descriptive representation is the extent to which a representative resembles constituents. In other words, the focus here is on shared identity traits. A Hispanic person being represented by a Hispanic representative is one example. The key idea is that common identities are an important part of representation (occupation, gender, race, age, educational attainment, etc.)

Substantive representation is the actual activity of a representative. This means their view/values and how they actually behave in office (how they vote on legislation, what kind of legislation they author/support, etc.). From the substantive side, it is less important who they are. What matters is what they do.

PROCEDURES: You are about to link these concepts with your state senate district and state senator (i.e. analyzing the demographics of your district and the identity of your representative). You will conduct this analysis by doing the following:

Websites/Navigation:
1) Find your state senator by entering your address into this web page (https://wrm.capitol.texas.gov/home). Pay close attention that you are looking up your STATE SENATOR not your U.S. senator. It will say “Texas State Senate District ##” under their name. Click on their name to go to their page.
2) In new windows/tabs, open the links at the bottom of the page titled “District Profile”, “Population Analysis”, and “Election Analysis.” Keep these pages handy, you will need the demographic and electoral information.
3) Next, navigate to https://www.texastribune.org/2021/06/16/texas-senate-left-right/. Keep this page handy also.
4) Now that you have the required sites up, you can start on the writing portion. IMPORTANT NOTE: You are largely being graded for how thorough your answers are for each part. This means that each part should be answered in AT LEAST 150 words (complete sentences and IN YOUR OWN WORDS). If you avoid being lazy you should do well.

Writing Section #1 (20 Points):
1) Your first set of questions asks you to compare/contrast your background with that of your congressional district (your community). [SR1]
a. Describe your personal/cultural background (5 pts). Be sure to note any aspects of your identity that are important to political values (race/ethnicity, parents occupation, parents education, household income, gender). Has this produced conservative, liberal, or moderate values? Do you identify more with Democrats or Republicans? (Note: If this feels too personal/intrusive, feel free to make up an imaginary person.)
b. Using the info from the “District Profile”, “Population Analysis”, and “Election Analysis” pages, describe the demographics and party tendencies of your district (5 pts). Be sure to discuss race/ethnicity, per capita income, and education. Also, discuss the party leanings of your district with your party leanings (yours is what you described in Q1). Note: For party tendencies you will use the results of the 2020 U.S presidential election (Biden vs. Trump). This will be the first election listed on the election analysis page. The greater the support for one candidate or other, the more “partisan” your district.
c. Compare and contrast yourself with your district (5 pts). Where do you see the greatest differences between you and your district? How might these differences produce contrasting political perspectives on issues? (If it’s helpful, feel free to use example issues like taxation, immigration, abortion, voter ID laws, etc.)?

2) Your next task is to compare/contrast your background/values with your state senator’s. [SR1]
a. Compare and contrast your background with that of your state senator (5 pts). You can learn about their background both from looking at them and also reading about them on their website. Where is your common ground? Where are you different? Would you say that this is a strong descriptive representative for you?
Writing Section #2 (20 points):
3) Next, explore your state senator’s substantive representation (i.e. their values and positions on issues) [PR1 and PR2]:
a. Using the ideology information from the TribTalk page, compare your personal ideology to your state senator’s (5 pts). According to the ideology score chart, how conservative/liberal is your representative? (You can measure this by how far right or left they are from center and by comparing them to other state senators.) How does this compare/contrast with your ideology? Are you more liberal/conservative? Do you lean toward their party?
b. Using either your state senator’s bio page, personal website, or campaign website, identify your state senator’s position on a key issue (5 pts). What type of issue is it (social or fiscal) and does your senator take a liberal or conservative position (be sure to explain why)? What is your position? In your opinion, what should be done about this issue? Do you agree or disagree with your senator (and why)?

4) Now that you have an issue position, you should think about how to put it into action. [SR2]
a. Who in the government OR community should be involved? What specific actions can you (and others) take? Why is it important to get people involved in this cause and what will be the benefits of this action? (5 pts.)

5) Let’s assume that you are successful in your efforts, and you achieve your policy goal. Now it is time to assess the impact of this potential change. [PR3]
a. What do you believe will be the consequences of putting this policy into practice? (5 pts.) How would this improve your community, state, and country? What do you think will be the short-term effects (within the next year or two)? How about the long-term impacts (beyond 2 years)? Finally, what are some negative unintended consequences that might result from this course of action?

Sample Solution

The organization of hazard based oversight in congruity with the Basel Center Standards to screen shortcomings and re-capitalisation has added to the security of the framework. The business is very much promoted with normal capital ampleness proportion of 18% somewhere in the range of 2010 and 2015 altogether over the 10% prudential and legal necessity.

Shortcomings
Despite the steps chalked by the Ghanaian financial area, banking infiltration actually fails to impress anyone. Bawumia (2010) promoted the unbanked populace as 70% and Wampah (2014) revealed the unbanked populace proportion as surpassing 80% with banking activities generally urbanized. Strategising to rope in a greater amount of the unbanked people is likewise tested by the low monetary proficiency rate. The fairly low saturation of banks to the rustic regions suggests a critical unexploited fragment to prepare stores and increase the productivity of the framework.

Ackah and Asiamah (2014) recorded that the significant expense of credit, high loaning rate and low credit accessibility to the confidential area have perplexed the area. Loaning rate found the middle value of 28.51% from 2005 to 2016 having accomplished the most elevated of 42.84% in August 2016 and least of 21.24% in Walk 2008. Exorbitant loan cost spreads found the middle value of 23.01% somewhere in the range of 2009 and 2014 when contrasted with a sub-Saharan normal of 8.57% in 2012 (Adoah, 2015; Garr and Kyereboah, 2013; Mansah and Abor, 2013; tradingeconomics.com). Ghanaian banks are tested with adjusting risk the executives and development. Absence of designs to learn veracity of ID and financial record of borrowers opens the business to extortion. The approach to accumulate definite client data after opening of records has not gotten the job done in preventing banking extortion. Boateng, Boateng and Acquah (2014) affirmed yearly misfortune to bank misrepresentation run into a great many Ghana cedis.

Open doors
The foundation of unfamiliar possessed banks into Ghanaian managing an account with the essential to bring into Ghana 60% of starting capital in unfamiliar convertible cash makes the stage for infusion of unfamiliar funding to invigorate financial turn of events (Tetteh, 2014). Unfamiliar possessed banks structure around

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.