Choose two scholarly research articles that incorporate research methodology (qualitative or quantitative research studies) that were published within the last three years. These articles can be found by searching in a database (like ProQuest). Pick two of the following areas as the focus of the research articles you choose: 1) women and higher education, 2) politics and higher education, or 3) culture and higher education. Follow the expectations outlined below.
Write a summary paper addressing each of the following points/question. Be sure to completely answer all questions in each bullet point. There should be two sections, one for each numerical bullet below. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for each article. Your essay should be 1750-words in length. Cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimal word amount.
1. Summarize both professional, peer-reviewed articles by addressing the follow for each study. Repeat this sequence for each article.
1. What question/hypothesis was the researcher trying to answer or investigate?
2. Define the variables studied.
3. Describe the sample.
4. How did the researcher gather data in the study? Were the data gathering techniques appropriate or the purposes of the study? In other words, did the data collection procedures produce data that allowed for the accurate examination of the original questions/hypothesis for the study?
5. What were the results? How do the results affect your understanding of the world?
6. What did you learn about faculty-student relationships in higher education from this study?
2. Compare and contrast both studies and explain how the similarities and differences.
This paper examines two recent scholarly articles exploring various aspects of higher education. By summarizing and comparing these studies, we aim to gain a deeper understanding of the issues and dynamics that shape the contemporary university experience.
Section 1: “I Am My Family’s Caregiver and Social Worker”: Experiences of Doctoral Student Moms During the COVID-19 Pandemic” by Kylie E. Evans et al. (2024)
1. Research Question:
This qualitative study investigates the experiences of doctoral student mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the challenges they faced in balancing childcare responsibilities, academic pursuits, and emotional wellbeing. The researchers aim to understand how the pandemic exacerbated existing stressors and impacted their ability to navigate the doctoral program.
2. Variables Studied:
3. Sample:
The study employs a purposive sampling strategy, recruiting 15 doctoral student mothers enrolled in various programs across different universities in the United States. Participants identified as cisgender women and belonged to diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds.
4. Data Collection:
The researchers conducted semi-structured interviews via video conferencing platforms. The interview questions delved into participants’ experiences with childcare, academic work, emotional stress, and coping mechanisms during the pandemic.
5. Results:
The study reveals that the COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted the lives of doctoral student mothers. School closures and increased childcare demands created immense pressure, leading to feelings of guilt, frustration, and isolation. Participants described challenges in maintaining focus and productivity, struggling to balance virtual learning for their children with their own coursework and research. Despite these difficulties, the study also highlights the resilience and resourcefulness of these women. Many participants developed strategies for managing their time, utilized online support groups, and sought accommodations from their professors.
6. Faculty-Student Relationships:
While not the primary focus, the study suggests that the understanding and support of faculty could be crucial for doctoral student mothers. Flexible deadlines, alternative assignment options, and open communication with professors could significantly alleviate stress and contribute to their academic success.
Section 2: “Trans Student Discrimination, College Access, and Finances: A Critical Quantitative Analysis” by C. V. Dolan et al. (2024)
1. Research Question:
This quantitative study investigates the relationship between gender identity (focusing on transgender students) and college access and financial aid. The researchers aim to understand how discrimination based on gender identity might impact a student’s ability to pursue higher education.
2. Variables Studied:
3. Sample:
The study utilizes data from the National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS) for the years 2018-2021. The sample includes over 140,000 undergraduate students from various institutions across the United States.
4. Data Collection:
The study relies on secondary data analysis from the NPSAS, a nationally representative survey that collects information on student demographics, financial aid, and enrollment patterns.
5. Results:
The findings reveal significant disparities in college enrollment and financial aid for transgender students compared to their cisgender counterparts. Transgender students were less likely to be enrolled in college and receive financial aid. Additionally, the study identified variations within the transgender population, with non-binary students experiencing the most significant disadvantages.
6. Faculty-Student Relationships:
This study examines access and financial barriers; however, limited access to higher education for transgender students could indirectly limit opportunities for interaction with faculty and participation in the intellectual life of the university.
Similarities:
Both studies explore the experiences of marginalized groups within higher education. They utilize quantitative and qualitative methodologies respectively, but both highlight the inequalities and challenges faced by students navigating the university system.
Differences:
Evans et al. (2024) focus on the specific challenges faced by mothers in doctoral programs during the COVID-19 pandemic, employing a qualitative approach to capture their lived experiences. Dolan et al. (2024) examine the broader issue of gender identity and access to higher education using quantitative data from a national survey. This difference in methodology allows Evans et al. (2024) to delve deeper into the emotional and social impact of balancing motherhood with academic pursuits, while Dolan et al. (2024) provide a broader national perspective on the disparities faced by transgender students.
Conclusion:
These two articles offer valuable insights into the comp