Attributions and Academic Integrity
In this discussion, we will explore attributions and academic integrity. These two topics are fundamental to this course and throughout your time at SNHU.
For your initial post, address the following:
Why is attribution of works important?
How would you define plagiarism? How is it different from sharing someone else's post, word for word, on social media?
Has anyone plagiarized your work? How did you react? If you have not experienced someone plagiarizing your work, how might you respond if someone had?
Sample Solution
Attribution of works is important as it ensures that creators are given proper recognition for the work they produce. For example, when an author publishes a book or article, it’s customary to include the name of the creator within the text or in a footnote so readers can easily identify who wrote what. This allows individuals to connect with the content – which can be especially helpful in academic settings – and rewards contributors for their hard work by providing them with much deserved credit.
Additionally, attribution is also important from a legal standpoint; depending on where you live this may require citing authors through copyright laws such as The Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) in Australia which explicitly outlines how works must be attributed if they are to be used without breaching any regulations.
In conclusion, attributing works is essential both ethically and legally; not only does it help ensure that creators get their due recognition but it also places necessary boundaries around intellectual property rights which helps protect creative endeavors from exploitation while simultaneously rewarding those who produce original material.
regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it's anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are 'recoded' and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller's unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi