Barriers to introducing policies and procedures
1.Outline at least three key components of an EMS.
2.Outline at least two barriers to introducing policies and procedures, and strategies that can be used to address each of the barriers you identify
Sample Solution
Barriers to introducing policies and procedures Barriers to introducing policies and procedures can be rooted in a variety of causes, including opposition from stakeholders, inadequate human or financial resources, lack of clarity on operational guidelines or roles and responsibilities for implementation, conflicts with other existing policies, and lack of coordination and collaboration between parties responsible for implementation. To address these barriers, stakeholders must assess the root cause of the challenges and develop targeted strategies to address each barrier in collaboration with other interested and empowering parties. Strategies that can be used to address these barriers include gathering and synthesizing different types of information from various sources; identify solutions to challenges and advocate for corrective action; and maintain systems to facilitate regular reviews of implementation experiences, share best practices across groups, and integrate lessons learned into subsequent policies and action plans.
had a long position; simultaneously, the speculator will deliver the 100 ounces of gold and receive $46,500 as per the second forward contract in which he or she held a short position. Because the $5,000 short-term profit cannot be realized for 9 months (settlement day for the two contracts), the net combined value of these forward contracts is the present value of the $5,000 to be received when they expire. With settlement in 9 months, if the risk-free rate is assumed to be 5%, the value of the “covered” original forward agreement is:
This represents a discount of $180.72 from the value of a comparable futures contract, which could be realized immediately by simply “selling” it in the futures market. It would appear, therefore, that the value of forward contracts should be less than that of comparable futures contracts because they are less liquid and expose the counterparties to more credit risk. However, these unfavorable factors are offset by the fact that forward contracts do not require the counter-parties to make margin or mark-to-market deposits, and they may receive slightly better tax treatment from a timing perspective. Empirical studies indicate that price differentials between comparable forward and futures contracts typically are negligible, suggesting that the advantages and disadvantages between forward and futures contracts are largely offsetting.