Behavior analytic journal that uses a multiple baseline design

Select a published study in a behavior analytic journal that uses a multiple baseline design and evaluate its adherence to the requirements for making comparisons across baselines. Be sure to reference the article in APA format.

In your post, include the following:

Identify the experimental question and purpose of the study. (5 points)
Identify the exact design utilized (e.g., non-concurrent multiple baseline) (5 points)
Evaluate the visual display of data and describe the (2 points each):
Level
Trend
Variability
Latency to change
Summarize if the study demonstrated control and evidence to support your decision (2 points).
In your response to a peer, identify which type of experimental question was utilized in their study. A (5) point response cost for failure to complete this task.

Sample Solution

Evaluating a Multiple Baseline Design: A Case Study

Selected Study:

Title: Evaluating the Effects of a Self-Monitoring Intervention on Time Spent Studying in College Students (Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2018, 51(1), 78-91) [Dougan et al., 2018]

Experimental Question and Purpose:

The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a self-monitoring intervention in increasing the time college students spent studying. The researchers wanted to establish a functional relationship between the intervention and studying behavior.

Design:

The study utilized a non-concurrent multiple baseline design across three participants.

Data Analysis:

The visual data displays (line graphs) allow for an evaluation of the following aspects:

Level: Baseline levels of studying time varied across participants, with Participant 1 averaging around 30 minutes, Participant 2 around 45 minutes, and Participant 3 around 15 minutes.

Trend: Baselines were relatively stable for each participant before the intervention.

Variability: Baseline data showed some variability within each participant, but no consistent patterns were observed.

Latency to change: Following the introduction of the intervention, all three participants exhibited an increase in studying time within a few sessions.

Control and Evidence:

The study demonstrates some evidence of control. The introduction of the intervention coincided with a clear and consistent increase in studying time across all participants, while baseline levels remained stable before the intervention. However, due to the non-concurrent design, alternative explanations for the observed changes (e.g., history, maturation) cannot be entirely ruled out.

Conclusion:

While the study provides preliminary support for the effectiveness of the self-monitoring intervention, the non-concurrent multiple baseline design limits the ability to definitively conclude a causal relationship between the intervention and the observed behavior change. Future research could consider using a concurrent multiple baseline design or other designs that offer stronger internal validity.

Peer Response Prompt:

Based on the information provided in your post, can you identify what type of experimental question was utilized in the study you selected? (e.g., functional relationship, treatment efficacy, descriptive analysis)

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.