Though technology, in its increasing ubiquity, largely serves to simplify and make more convenient many daily processes, the extent to which people use and are reliant on technology means that the potential for a vulnerable attack is also heightened. Health care technology has made massive strides in improving quality patient care, making telehealth more accessible to the masses, and cutting down on unnecessary costs. But the more data are digitized, the greater the probability of a breach.
Imagine a scenario in which it was discovered that a company producing wearable fitness-tracking devices had been selling confidential consumer data to the consumers’ health insurance company. Based off of the data consumers had been entering in their fitness-tracking app, this third-party insurance company was then able to suggest health and life insurance plans that would best meet the needs of their clients.
In a paper, address the following points:
1. How is this scenario an example of an ethics breach? In what ways were both entities responsible for violating consumer confidentiality?
2. What consequences might both companies face as a result of this breach?
3. Moving forward, what changes would the health insurance company need to implement in order to ensure that their communications with customers and corporations comply with HIPAA?
4. Suppose that a customer had updated a health insurance plan based off of a recommendation made by the insurance company, founded on information received illicitly from the fitness-tracking company. If the customer had a medical emergency that required the use of that added health insurance coverage, is the insurance company still in the wrong? Is the fitness-tracking company still in the wrong? If the misuse of customer data helped to save a patient’s life, was there still a breach of ethics? Explain your position.
5. How will a renewed commitment by both corporations to honor the confidentiality of customer information serve to promote the common good? How is ethical decision making within a business setting consistent with the Christian worldview (CWV)?
olysis and Proteolysis Assessment: Lipolysis index was determined by the method of Nonez et al.14. Acid Degree Value (ADV) can measure the rancidity of cheese by de-emulsification and separation of free fat, followed by titration of free fatty acid by alcoholic KOH in a weighed portion of fat.
The pH 4.6 soluble nitrogen (SN) of cheese samples was obtained modifying the procedure of Kuchroo and Fox18, as described by Sousa and McSweeney19. pH 4.6-insoluble fraction of the cheese was assessed using a Urea-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) which performed by Protean II XI vertical slab gel unit (Bio-Rad Laboratories Ltd., Watford, UK) according to the method of Shalabi and Fox20. Gels were stained directly with Coomassie Brillant Blue G250, as described by Blakesley and Boezi21
Rheological Measurements: The dynamic rheological properties of the processed cheeses were measured after 2 weeks of storage at 4 °C, using a controlled stress rheometer (Anton Paar, MCR301, Austria). Cheese samples were carefully cut to 25 mm diameter discs using a cylindrical cutter. The measurements were carried out at 25°C using a cone and plate system. A strain sweep (0. 1-100%) at 25°C and frequency of 1 Hz were used to determine the limits of linear viscoelastic behavior of the model processed cheese. A frequency sweep test was performed at 5 °C and a strain amplitude of 0.2% with the frequency varied from 1 to 100 Hz. A temperature sweep test was performed at a constant frequency of 10 Hz and a constant strain amplitude of 1%, with the temperature varying from 25 to 80 °C at 5 °C /min. The storage modulus (Gʹ), the loss modulus (Gʺ) and the loss factor (tan d) were determined. All the rheological measurements were made at least in triplicate and the average reported.
Sensory Analysis: Processed cheese samples were evaluated by a panel of 15