1. How are the Elizabethan Poor Laws, though extinct, still influencing current social welfare policies? How do economic considerations come into play? Use the NASW Code of EthicsLinks to an external site. Web page to challenge the premises of the Poor Laws.
2. From the movie Joe the King..You are the social worker for Joe’s family and are tasked with completing a family assessment.
What are all of the biological factors in play for each family member?
How might these biological factors influence family dynamics?
How might these biological factors interact with relevant psychological or societal systems?
Elizabethan Poor Laws
The Elizabethan Poor Laws were a series of laws passed in England in the late 16th and early 17th centuries that established a system of public welfare for the poor. The laws classified the poor into two categories: the “worthy poor,” who were the elderly, sick, and disabled, and the “unworthy poor,” who were the able-bodied unemployed and vagrants. The worthy poor were entitled to receive assistance from their local parish, while the unworthy poor were forced to work in workhouses.
Influence on Current Social Welfare Policies
The Elizabethan Poor Laws had a profound influence on the development of social welfare policies in England and the United States. Many of the principles of the Poor Laws, such as the use of taxation to fund social welfare programs and the distinction between the worthy and unworthy poor, can still be seen in current social welfare policies.
One of the most significant influences of the Poor Laws is the concept of using taxation to fund social welfare programs. This concept is now widely accepted in both England and the United States. For example, both countries have social welfare programs such as Social Security and Medicare that are funded through payroll taxes.
Another important influence of the Poor Laws is the distinction between the worthy and unworthy poor. This distinction is still reflected in many current social welfare programs. For example, many programs are designed to provide assistance to the working poor and the disabled, while other programs are designed to provide assistance to the unemployed and homeless.
Economic Considerations
Economic considerations play a major role in the development and implementation of social welfare policies. Governments must balance the need to provide assistance to the poor with the need to maintain a stable economy. This can be a difficult balancing act, and often leads to disagreements about the scope and adequacy of social welfare programs.
Those who support generous social welfare programs argue that it is the government’s responsibility to ensure that all citizens have a basic standard of living. They argue that investing in social welfare programs can benefit the economy by reducing poverty and crime, and by increasing productivity.
Those who oppose generous social welfare programs argue that they are too expensive and that they discourage people from working. They argue that the government should not be involved in providing assistance to the poor, and that this responsibility should be left to the private sector.
Challenging the Premises of the Poor Laws
The NASW Code of Ethics is a set of ethical principles that guides the practice of social work. The code is based on the values of service, social justice, dignity and worth of the person, importance of human relationships, integrity, and competence.
The following NASW Code of Ethics principles challenge the premises of the Poor Laws:
The Elizabethan Poor Laws were based on the premise that the poor are to blame for their own poverty. This premise is challenged by the NASW Code of Ethics, which recognizes that poverty is often caused by factors beyond an individual’s control, such as discrimination, lack of access to education and employment opportunities, and mental or physical illness.
The NASW Code of Ethics also challenges the distinction between the worthy and unworthy poor. The code states that all people are worthy of dignity and respect, regardless of their circumstances.
Family Assessment
Biological Factors