Book name “A Place to Stand ” by Jimmy Santiago Baca

at
Categories
Tags

1. Jimmy is in San Francisco and he’s carrying a slip of paper with an address written on it. Describe the significance of this address and the outcome of the scene?
2. Who is Tara and what does Jimmy steal from her?
3. What results from Jimmy warning Rick that there is a price on his head?

1. Describe one moment in Chapter 7 that stands out as significant to you and explain the logic of your choice?
2. “I was no longer a twenty-two-year-old illiterate brown man, not just another con with a number who was going to submit to degradation. Something had altered in me. I felt tremendous pride in having taken this one little step. I now knew I had wanted to take it for a long time” (168).
Explain what leads up to Baca’s new feelings of pride. Describe the steps he too?
3. Explain what inspires Baca to practice reading and writing while he is in the dungeon?

1.“How can you kill and still be a poet? How can you ever write another poem if you disrespect life in this manner? Do you know you will forever be changed by this act? It will haunt you to your dying breath.” Explain where Baca hears these words and why?
2. Describe 2 things that Chelo teaches Jimmy?
3. This question has no correct answer. Once you have finished reading (through the Epilogue) reflect on your experience with this book over the course of the semester. I’m interested in your personal response to Jimmy Baca’s memoir and how it influenced you in this class. Write at least 50 words that address this reflection, and you will earn full credit?

Sample Solution

Deductive frameworks maintain a strategic distance from a large number of the risks of mystical reasoning and therapist by requiring kept testing for falsifiability. Positivism falls under Popper’s assault for lacking between subjectivity and for roundabout or repetitious reasoning. Returning again to the advantages of falsifiability, Popper shows how the positivist system to show affirmation of a declaration’s “noteworthiness” is inductive and should thusly be disregarded. He saw that the Positivists incessantly fathom the issue of framework naturalistically; that is, they appreciate it just as it were an issue of regular science. Instead of accepting it as their commitment to prescribe a fitting custom, they trust they have to comprehend a differentiation, existing in the method for things, allegorically, between test sciences on one edge and otherworldliness on the other. Popper contends that; the positivists are diligently attempting to demonstrate that mysticism by its very nature is only preposterous, waste that is, misconception and fantasy, as Hume proclaims, ought to be focused on the blazes.

Popper, along these lines, adopts on an ordinary strategy; he trusts that, his basis of outline will, in this manner, must be viewed as a proposal for an agreement. With regards to the propriety of any such understanding, sentiments may shift, and a sane exchange of these requests is just possible among parties sharing some persistence for all intents and purpose. The decision of that industriousness must, obviously, be at long last a matter of decision; going above judicious contention. Popper’s points of science are extraordinary; he doesn’t attempt to legitimize his objectives, nonetheless, by speaking to them as the genuine or the indispensable points of science. Since, in the event that he defends his objectives; this would just distort the issue, and it would mean a disintegration into positivist dictatorship. Thus, he fights that there is stand apart a technique for antagonism rationally in the sponsorship of his suggestions. This incorporates an assessment of their astute results: to point out their productivity’their vitality to explain the issues of the theory of data.

Popper tests the use of his measures on issues associated with probability communicating that probability declaration can’t be discredited right now declaration, ‘It will rain or not rain here tomorrow’ won’t be seen as test, just considering the way that it can’t be negated; while the declaration, ‘It will rain here tomorrow’ will be seen as observational.

1.4 Summary

Get Answer