The essences of the men in the artwork are avoided seeing the watcher. They are either covered up by their caps, or they have their backs turned. By concealing their appearances the watcher can infer that the personalities of these characters are not imperative to the importance behind the artistic creation. Benton additionally presents these men in comparable dress: long, dull jeans and long-sleeve shirts, which adds to the possibility that these men are not significant on the grounds that they are not special from one another. The artistic creation portrays times before power and the development of the join in light of the fact that the man to the extreme left is utilizing a grass shearer and the others are utilizing their hands to gather the grain. This could propose that the main importance behind the work of art is to show the life of ranchers before the development of machines. Since the men don’t have any personality and are apparently immaterial to significance behind the composition, the watcher is unoriginal to the image and can essentially appreciate the hues and shapes that make it outwardly satisfying.

The shapes, hues, and characters make the canvas appealing. Every one of these three parts of the canvas cooperate to make a wonderful, picturesque image of moving slopes and broad wheat handle that delineate the regular daily existence of ranchers in a Midwestern zone, in the 1930’s. The lines and edges of the artistic creation make the image look as though it is really moving and emits a sort of vitality that the watcher can nearly feel just by taking a gander at the canvas.

At whatever point I take a gander at workmanship, I as a rule don’t attempt to break down what the work may be stating or locate a more profound significance behind it. This artwork may have a more profound importance behind it, yet the absence of thoughtfulness regarding the characters of the ranchers persuades that there doesn’t need to be a more profound significance. Rather, the a wide range of hues and the general movement made by the groups of the laborers and the general condition, were sufficient to catch my eye making me look at the work of art and take in the straightforward certainty that it is a pretty and satisfying pictureThe Antigone, a renowned catastrophe play made by Sophocles, is a spellbinding magnum opus that has numerous fascinating minutes in it. Antigone, the hero in the whole play, is Oedipus’ sister and little girl since Oedipus wedded his organic mother. Oedipus kicks the bucket, and resultantly Ismene and Antigone become the last type of the all-inclusive Labdacus family. Antigone grew up with her sister in Creon’s home. The play is amazing with the rich catastrophe and show that it contains. In any case, among the significant catastrophes in the whole play is that of Creon and the acclaimed Antigone. These two characters take part in a critical clash occasioned by their determined nature that comes full circle in fatalities. The contention exudes from a position that is two-crease. Initially, Creon has an unshaken steadfastness to his state while Antigone has an undying pledge to her family’s prosperity, religion and eventually her soul. These characters are the starting points of enlivened discussions among the devotees of the play on who ought to get more compassion than the other basing on the disastrous encounters that they experience in the whole story. Consequently, this paper gives an extensive conversation on my decision of the character that gets a greater amount of my compassion than the other by basically investigating and portraying their character qualities as dependent on the sad storyline that the play has.