Business partnership.

You are a self-employed accountant. A client of yours is considering going into a partnership with a business associate. The partnership would own a retail gourmet ice cream shop. Your client anticipates investing $150,000 and working ten hours a week. His business associate will invest $50,000 and work forty hours a week. Your client has requested your informed perspective on a number of items before he commits to the business partnership.

Your client has requested the following be included in a report (4–6 pages) that he can study while considering how to approach this business opportunity:
• Your client does not think that splitting the partnership income 50-50 will be fair to either partner. He has asked you to recommend clauses in the partnership agreement that stipulate partnership income and loss allocations.
o Create a recommended income allocation schedule using interest allowances at 10 percent a year and salary allowances at $25 an hour. For the sake of example, assume partnership income of $100,000.
o Create a recommended loss allocation schedule. For the sake of example, assume partnership losses of $40,000.
• Your client would also like you to create a schedule that shows what happens if this partnership is successful and the two partners agree to sell the company in 10 years.
o For the sake of this calculation, pretend that the partnership’s assets in 10 years are $900,000, liabilities are $200,000, your client’s capital is $400,000 and his associate’s capital is $300,000.
o Pretend that the partnership assets are sold for $1,200,000, and the liabilities are settled for the existing value of $200,000.
• The company’s flagship location would be in Buffalo, New York, but the potential partners have already discussed opening additional locations in Toronto, Canada. The client knows that as a partnership they would not have to meet the Securities and Exchange Commission’s segment reporting requirements, but the client wants to know what happens if they reorganize as a corporation when they move into the Canadian market. Discuss how the Securities and Exchange Commission’s segment reporting requirements apply to corporations.
• Create a schedule showing how a partnership income would be allocated to each of the partners using interest allowances and salary allowances.
• Create a schedule showing how a partnership loss would be allocated to each of the partners to make loss-sharing as fair as possible.
• Discuss how the Securities and Exchange Commission’s segment reporting requirements apply to corporations.
• Apply quantitative models to create and manage budgets and forecasts and evaluate budget performance.
o Create a schedule that shows how partnership assets would be allocated in the event of a liquidation.

The acknowledgment of Whitney of all styles of contemporary American workmanship let it have an a lot more extensive scope of works with an increasingly diverse contribution. Mariners and Floozies don’t adhere to explicit measures of other contemporary arrangements, yet shows clear and expressive “enchantment pragmatist” style of Cadmus, as it frequently named.

The watcher’s eye is pulled in a counterclockwise development from the leaning back mariner, wearing his white dress, where Italian Renaissance craftsmanship firmly impacted Cadmus that thus took its lead from antiquated Greek and Roman workmanship through a marine who gets with a floozie and prizes him with a slap. Additional telling subtleties is the first page of the New York Daily News, which puts things in place in recorded point of view. Indeed, even wrinkled, it’s conceivable to see the substance of Mussolini on the first page of the paper.

Craftsmanship and homosexuality feel connected to us as indicated by Christopher Reed, as gay people and workmanship attested their personalities around a similar time, and in habits, which stressed their autonomy from every sort of sealed shut society. During the 1930s and 1940s, a ton of American craftsmen reacted to the World War II and Great Depression with brave photos of normal individuals in the Social Realist Style. Cadmus was just craftsman associated alongside this development who invested in archiving the encounters of gay individuals. Gay students of history have shown that WW2 was a critical defining moment, which offered open doors for men to feel and follow up on same-sex attractions. Be that as it may, this open minded condition changed drastically after the war, when the objective of the general public was come back to commonality simultaneously, a reestablished accentuation on family unit. Men who discovered their gay wants and had begun to make connections, structure connections and fight for their social equality found themselves arraigned and abused.

Like such a large number of his works, Sailor and Floozies restore a more established, practically medieval arrangement of ethical quality that the painter conjures to get an eyeful of a satiric eye on his peers. Cadmus delineates the prehistoric unethical behavior of ladies and men as a mind boggling congress of hookers and floozies from one perspective, and warriors and mariners on the other, every one of them assembled in Riverside Park.

Despite the fact that most of the allusion is hetero, you will discover insinuations of homosexuality as well. With certain special cases, the figures are clumsy and terrible. What most of moderns neglected to esteem was that this artful culmination of Cadmus a long way from being provocative in the method for contemporary workmanship was overpoweringly moderate. Irrefutably, it restored the old and conventional job of the comedian, who teaches his counterparts by summoning them to a beginning period of profound quality. Paul Cadmus stated “I am a humorist essentially,” and “Parody is the most clear medium I know to communicate my affection for society and my craving, through analysis, to improve it.”

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.