Caravaggio’s revolutionary artistic choices, including using everyday people as models for his religious figures, undeniably impacted the meaning and viewer experience of his paintings. Let’s take his iconic masterpiece, “The Calling of Saint Matthew” (1599-1600), as an example:

Opens in a new windowen.wikipedia.org

Calling of Saint Matthew by Caravaggio

Subverting the Sacred:

This painting depicts the moment Jesus calls Matthew, a tax collector, to become his disciple. Traditionally, such scenes were portrayed in idealized settings with figures adorned in historical or symbolic attire. However, Caravaggio chose a dingy tavern bathed in dramatic chiaroscuro lighting.

• Ordinary Figures: Jesus and Matthew are clad in contemporary clothing, making them indistinguishable from the other patrons at first glance. This challenges the idealized portrayal of holy figures, grounding them in the raw reality of Caravaggio’s Rome.
• Gestural Intensity: The painting is full of dynamic gestures and intense expressions, capturing the drama and surprise of the calling. Matthew’s outstretched hand reaching for the money bag reflects his internal conflict, while Jesus’ authoritative gesture signifies his transformative power.

Impact on the Viewer:

Caravaggio’s choices create a jarring yet captivating experience for the viewer:

• Relatable Saints: By depicting the figures as ordinary people, Caravaggio makes the story more relatable and immediate. It challenges the notion of sainthood being reserved for distant, idealized figures and suggests that holiness can be found in anyone.
• Emotional Engagement: The dramatic lighting and gestures draw the viewer into the scene, evoking a sense of awe, shock, and even discomfort. This visceral engagement encourages deeper contemplation of the narrative’s meaning.
• Open-ended Interpretation: Unlike idealised figures with prescribed expressions, the ambiguity of the characters’ emotions leaves room for personal interpretation. The viewer actively participates in constructing the meaning of the scene, fostering a more personal connection with the story.

Conclusion:

Caravaggio’s use of everyday models wasn’t simply a stylistic choice; it was a deliberate act of subversion. By grounding the divine in the everyday, he challenged traditional interpretations of religious narratives and invited viewers to engage with the stories on a more personal and emotional level. This revolutionary approach continues to resonate with audiences centuries later, sparking thought, discussion, and a deeper appreciation for the human experience within the realm of the sacred.