Case studies related to a legal issue facing human resource management in public administration

 

You will identify and write a three separate critiques of 3 case studies related to a legal issue facing human resource management in public administration: Performance Management, Discrimination, and Employee Retention and Separation. Each Case Study Critique assignment is designed to help you make application of course content to the area of human resource management in public administration. The case studies will integrate relevant legal cases in which it supports your work and ensure a biblical integration to support position on whether the right or incorrect decision was made in the case.

Performance Management
Discrimination
Employee Retention and Separation

Each Case Study Critique Assignment must be 6 – 8 double-spaced pages of content (not counting title page, references, etc.) and discuss the major facts of the case, and you should tell whether or you believe the right decision(s) was/were made and why. You should incorporate a minimum of one article item into each assignment.
The format of each case study should be as follows:
• Identify the important facts in the case study
• What decision(s) were made in the case study
• Do you believe the decisions were appropriate?
• Discuss any alternative solution(s) to the problem and support those solutions with additional research. Make sure your solutions are relevant to the case and able to be implemented.

Sample Solution

You’ve been tasked with writing three case study critiques related to human resource management in public administration, focusing on performance management, discrimination, and employee retention and separation. Each critique should be 6-8 pages, include relevant legal cases, and demonstrate a biblical integration.

Case Study Critique Format:

  1. Identify important facts: Summarize the key details of the case study.
  2. Analyze decisions: Discuss the decisions made in the case.
  3. Evaluate appropriateness: Determine if the decisions were appropriate and why.
  4. Propose alternatives: Suggest alternative solutions with supporting research.

Note: To ensure a comprehensive and insightful analysis, consider incorporating biblical principles and legal cases that are relevant to the specific issues raised in each case study. This will strengthen your argument and provide a well-rounded perspective.

Here’s a possible structure for each critique:

Introduction

  • Briefly introduce the case study and its relevance to human resource management in public administration.
  • State your thesis or main argument.

Body

  • Facts of the case: Summarize the key details and context.
  • Analysis of decisions: Evaluate the decisions made and their implications.
  • Biblical integration: Discuss relevant biblical principles that apply to the case.
  • Legal considerations: Analyze any legal cases that are relevant to the situation.
  • Alternative solutions: Propose alternative approaches and support them with research.

Conclusion

  • Summarize your findings and reiterate your main argument.
  • Discuss the implications of the case for human resource management in public administration.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer