Case Study: Mr. Rodriquez

Mr. Rodriguez is a 50-year-old machinist referred by his primary care physician (PCP) to treat depression. He has been depressed for over 3 years since his wife’s death from colon cancer and his children “growing up and out of the house.” His depression is worsening. He has problems with decreased appetite (unintentional weight loss of 15 lbs. over the last eight months), difficulty falling and staying asleep, irritability, poor concentration, and anhedonia. His PCP prescribed paroxetine 3 months earlier, but Mr. Rodriguez hasn’t noticed much improvement in his symptoms-even at a dose of 40 mg daily. He tells you he has trouble carrying out normal routines (ADL’s) and social commitments and tells you he could’ve prevented his wife’s death if he “just knew” the symptoms better. At times he wished he had passed away with her. He’s preoccupied with low back pain, and when asked about depression, he doesn’t understand the correlation between depression and pain; he’ll answer your questions, and he keeps telling you his back pain is the “problem.”

Mr. Rodriguez has a history of taking tramadol for low back pain (3 years ago) when his PCP decided to stop prescribing tramadol due to using the prescription too quickly. In the past, he declined MAT (suboxone) and at this time isn’t interested or a candidate for MAT (suboxone). He has had chronic low back pain related to his job for the last 30 years. However, the pain is worsening over the last eight months. He had taken ibuprofen or naproxen with some relief, but he began having epigastric distress about three years ago when using these medications, and his PCP recommended discontinuing them. Once he stopped taking the NSAIDs, the epigastric distress resolved.

When you ask about his back pain, Mr. Rodriguez replies that he is willing to talk about it but doesn’t see how it’s relevant to the depression for which he was referred to you. What would your response be to Mr. Rodriguez?
What are two DSM-5 diagnoses you would consider for Mr. Rodriguez? Explain your rationale.
What are the questions you plan to ask him and screen for? What is Mr. Rodiriguez at risk for?
After reviewing his medication, you feel that a trial of a different antidepressant is indicated. What medication would you start him on? Why? Include the name (generic and brand), dose, route, and frequency/timing for all medications.
The patient mentions he had taken diazepam that his wife had been prescribed during her terminal illness to help him sleep. He asked his PCP to prescribe diazepam for him, but she was hesitant and suggested he discuss this with you. How should you proceed regarding sleep hygiene education and medication?
List at one therapy and one nonpharmacologic recommendation for Mr. Rodriguez? Explain your rationale.

Sample Solution

As part of the safeguarding process and to ensure safety, the SSW interviewed the foster carers to gather information about their suitability regarding the issues that were highlighted during the assessment. Various issues emerged including risk and strength. These issues indicated that the foster carers’ interactions might have put Lyndsey at further risk. According to Stalker (2003), risk is pervasive in social work practice. He also mentions that risk-taking is persistently presented as acts of common sense. Kellick (2011) argues that the concept of risk in practice is ambiguous and slippery, and this makes it difficult to define. In terms of risk assessment, Titterton (2005) suggests this is the gathering of information on any potential elements of risk, which include exposure, harm, and consequence. A risk assessment can also be referred to as a systematic gathering of information used to recognise the complexity of potential risks. It is designed to identify the probability of future incidences, and in this way, can help foresee an escalation of a service user’s behaviour, or else their enthusiasm for change (Carson and Bain, 2008).

The importance of acknowledging risk in social work is not restricted to Serious Case Reviews and academic research. Risk can significantly affect an individual’s life. This is frequently portrayed in popular entertainment, media, and culture (Fraser et al., 1999). Every day, a hazard is reported as having occurred or been closely avoided, alongside the offering of preventative measures to further protect oneself or to promote well-being (Hall, 2014). This is particularly the case for situations involving vulnerable adults and children. The position and profile of risk in everyday life is documented as both dynamic and static, which enforces an everyday risk awareness (Craig et al, 2008).
Dynamic risk factors are elements of risk that are open to change over a period of time. These risk factors are usually outside an individual’s control (Craig et al, 2008). In contrast, static risk factors are unalterable features or characteristics that are measured as being reliable pointers to risk (Allan and Fisher, 2011). Static risk factors are useful for appraising long-term risks that will not change over time (Hood, 2018). To link theory to practice, by using Lyndsey’s case, numerous dynamic factors were identified in Lyndsey’s assessment, which include Lyndsey not being in education or employment and instead being fully dependent on her weekly allowances from the LA and Lyndsey’s lack of engagement with professionals or services like the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS).

Another dynamic factor, identified by SSW, was the foster carer’s use of language. SSW asked the foster carers to instead of being solution focused on discussions with Lyndsey, to consider Lyndsey’s strengths when conversing. SS

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.