CHANCE OF SURVIVAL DIMINISHED

 

 

On the afternoon of May 20, the patient, Mr. Ard, began feeling nauseous. He was in pain and had shortness of breath. Although his wife rang the call bell several times, it was not until sometime later that evening that someone responded and gave Ard medication for the nausea. The nausea continued to worsen. Mrs. Ard then noticed that her husband was having difficulty breathing. He was reeling from side to side in bed. Believing that her husband was dying, she continued to call for help. She estimated that she rang the call bell for 1.25 hours before anyone responded. A code was eventually called. Unfortunately, Mr. Ard did not survive the code. There was no documentation in the medical records, on May 20 between 5:30 P.M. and 6:45 P.M., that would indicate that any nurse or physician checked on Ard’s condition. This finding collaborated Mrs. Ard’s testimony regarding this time period.

A wrongful death action was brought against the hospital, and the district court granted judgment for Mrs. Ard. The hospital appealed.

Ms. Krebs, an expert in general nursing, stated that it should have been obvious to the nurses from the physicians’ progress notes that the patient was a high risk for aspiration. This problem was never addressed in the nurses’ care plan or in the nurses’ notes.

On May 20, Ard’s assigned nurse was Ms. Florscheim. Krebs stated that Florscheim did not perform a full assessment of the patient’s respiratory and lung status. There was nothing in the record indicating that she completed such an evaluation after he vomited. Krebs also testified that a nurse did not conduct a swallowing assessment at any time. Although Florscheim testified that she checked on the patient around 6:00 P.M. on May 20, there was no documentation in the medical record.

Ms. Farris, an expert in intensive care nursing, testified for the defense. She disagreed with Krebs that there was a breach of the standard of care. However, on cross-examination, she admitted that if a patient was in the type of distress described by Mrs. Ard and no nurse checked on him for 1.25 hours, then that would fall below the expected standard of care.1

WHAT IS YOUR VERDICT? (Pozgar 215-216)
Pozgar, George D.. Legal Aspects of Health Care Administration, 11th Edition. Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2011-01-27. <vbk:9781449643850#outline(9.1)>.

Discussion Question 1

Discuss how physician malpractice suits can be decreased. How can a doctor be sued for malpractice? What current practices do doctors perform in order to avoid law suits? What are the impacts of these practices? How can one check for any malpractice suit against a doctor?

 

 

Sample Solution

 

 

 

 

String Theory

GuidesorSubmit my paper for investigation

string from string theoryThe world we live in today is continually progressing as far as science and innovation. Because of the Internet, the data about late logical revelations—which has before been just known by the picked not many—is currently generally accessible to the majority. Science has gotten mainstream, effectively available, and in any event, engaging. One of the ever-famous objects of enthusiasm for both science lovers and genuine physicists is string hypothesis, which has all the odds to turn into the most significant hypothesis throughout the entire existence of science. Be that as it may, what is its purpose?

To begin with, string hypothesis has not been built up at the same time in its cutting edge variant. Despite what might be expected, its premises had been created in the start of the twentieth century, and since that time, string hypothesis has experienced various changes. In like manner, various kinds of string hypothesis were named in an unexpected way. In various occasions—and relying upon the particularities of each sort—the hypothesis was called bosonic string hypothesis, supersymmetric string hypothesis, Type I, Type IIA, Type IIB, Heterotic string speculations, M-hypothesis, Matrix hypothesis, Brane world situations, and numerous others (Dummies.com). In this way, the present name “string hypothesis” is increasingly a speculation for various co-related hypotheses.

String hypothesis as we probably am aware it is an endeavor of present day material science to locate a solitary hypothesis that offers a definitive clarification to such powers of nature as gravity, electromagnetism, and solid and feeble atomic powers. As physicists have known for quite a while, matter comprises of particles; every one of them is a blend of electrons, protons, and neutrons. As science advanced, it was found that electrons, protons, and neutrons comprise of littler particles. As per string hypothesis, these particles are small vibrating strings (Physics.org). Researchers accept they are intricate items, the presence of which is conceivable because of long-chain between nuclear holding. An issue based vibrating string is the aftereffect of a mix of protection laws, mass, and helpful linearities that are inalienable to our constant type of spacetime. The strings are accepted to be made out of a factually improbable type of long-chain holding, contingent upon the properties of particles, which are mind boggling multiparticle structures and whose properties are fairly impossible (Physics.StackEschange).

String hypothesis presents the possibility of the multi-dimensional universe. Up until this point, researchers have thought about that lone four measurements exist (common space measurements and time). Nonetheless, string hypothesis recommends there ought to associate with eleven measurements. These days, physicists are searching for an approach to find these seven new measurements (Physics.org). No one but time can show what commonsense use humankind will have the option to remove from the disclosure of these extra measurements. Notwithstanding, it tends to be said that string hypothesis doesn’t prevent the chance from securing the presence of equal universes.

String hypothesis today is the most planned hypothesis clarifying such powers of nature as gravity, electromagnetism, and atomic powers. It accommodates—or if nothing else attempts to—the general hypothesis of relativity with quantum mechanics. All through its advancement, it has bore various names, for example, the bosonic string hypothesis, supersymmetric string hypothesis, etc. The hypothesis infers that the particles of which molecules—and, individually, matter—comprise are strings vibrating at various frequencies. What’s more, which is by all accounts all the more energizing to people in general, string hypothesis asserts the presence of equal universes is conceivable.

References

“String Theory for Dummies.” Cheat Sheet. N.p., n.d. Web. 20 July 2015.

“What are the Strings in String Theory Made of?” Physics Stack Exchange. N.p., n.d. Web. 20 July 2015.

“What is String Theory?” Physics.org. N.p., n.d. Web. 20 July 2015.

disclosure exposition, paper about nature, science article

 

 

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.