Brief Introduction
In addition to entertaining young children, children’s books are influential in the development of cognition, social skills, emotional intelligence, perceptive skills and many other domains. Your task in this assignment is to analyze — from a developmental-psychological perspective — the context and information depicted in a children’s book. You should think carefully about the information and materials presented and illustrated in the book, and then apply what you’ve learned this semester regarding the factors that influence children’s development. I urge you to bring any/all concepts encountered in this course that relate to the information, storyline, characters and/or behaviors portrayed.
Assignment
Choose a children’s book*, read it and look at the pictures. Then, after reading it:
(a) summarize the book [include book title and author], and then
(b) connect it to at least 2 developmental-psychological principles/concepts/theories that appear to be operating in the information, material, storyline, characters and/or behaviors depicted in the book.
For each principle that you identify:
(a) briefly describe the relevant information from the book;
(b) describe in detail the developmental-psychological principle you believe is relevant.
(c) Finally, briefly summarize how you believe this book is/is not an important tool for children’s development.
Sample Solution
Concealed Figures (2016, coordinated by Theodore Melfi) is a film that will all the while motivate and drive individuals mad at the unfairness African-American ladies confronted both in expert and day by day life. The primary characters of Katherine Goble, Mary Jackson, and Dorothy Vaughan worked at NASA and saw numerous open doors for their expert development; be that as it may, their managers and partners didn’t offer these ladies uphold nor did they regard their respect since they were all African-American. Key characters remembered for the examination will be Katherine and her boss Al Harrison in scenes about “shaded” bathrooms. The two contentions will expand upon Bonevac’s guideline of giving an announcement first, giving proof, and afterward making an end (64). In the article, two primary contentions will be made dependent on the functions portrayed in the film: while the ladies’ partners at NASA saw the potential in them and attempted to take out obstructions that kept African-American ladies from being treated as equivalent to different individuals from the staff, the film mutilated some genuine functions and painted a picture of NASA as a comprehensive working environment (run by white men) where ladies of shading could effectively work.
Endeavors to Eliminate Segregation
To begin with, NASA’s means to oblige Katherine, Mary, Dorothy, and other ladies of shading will be examined. A pivotal scene to investigate for this situation is the expulsion of a “shaded restroom” sign. Welcomed to add to the Space Task Group because of her splendid aptitudes in investigative calculation, Katherine needed to work in a structure where there were no bathrooms for African-American ladies. At that point, such a straightforward convenience as a washroom was profoundly isolated, which implied that Katherine couldn’t visit some other bathroom than for Blacks. Consistently, she needed to stumble into the whole grounds to go to a “shaded washroom.” When stood up to with the topic of where she was going each day for forty minutes, Katherine separated and gave the splendid “there are no bathrooms for me here” discourse, in which she referenced how hard she was functioning, how low her installment was, and how troublesome it became to run a large portion of a mile consistently to calm herself (Melfi).
Subsequent to tuning in to her discourse, the Group’s administrator, Al Harrison, concluded that it was the ideal opportunity for a change and thumped down the “hued washroom” sign saying “Not any more hued bathrooms, not any more white bathrooms [… ] We all be a similar tone” (Melfi). In the event that to utilize the U.S. Constitution to help the investigation, it is critical to make reference to three explicit focuses: the Thirteenth Amendment to the constitution announced a conclusion to servitude, the Fourteenth made the liberated slaves residents of the nation, and the Fifteenth gave the option to cast a ballot to all races. For this situation, it tends to be useful to cite the Fourteenth Amendment: “Nor will any state deny any individual of life, freedom, or property, without fair treatment of law; nor deny to any individual inside its ward the equivalent assurance of the laws” (“fourteenth Amendment”). Unmistakably isolated washrooms restricted ladies’ opportunity and constrained them to conform to the situation that was not reasonable for them as residents of the United States. While annihilating the “shaded washroom” sign, Mr. Harrison needed to show that NASA needed to venture advance and secure the opportunity of its workers paying little heed to their skin tone. After this function, male laborers turned out to be substantially more lenient and acknowledged of their African-American partner, and even eradicated a portion of their past mix-ups, for example, setting a “hued” espresso pot that was brought to the Space Task Group’s office after Katherine had joined the group.
Contortion of Real Events
In the event that to make a counter-contention to the investigation above, it is fundamental to make reference to that the film was “white-washed” somewhat so as to lift the part of white individuals in the battle for fairness in the work environment. Unfortunately, numerous functions portrayed in the film, including the restroom scene, essentially didn’t occur. While the film was historical and followed the genuine of Katherine, Dorothy, and Mary, it was likewise founded on a book Hidden Figures composed by Margot Lee Shetterly. The essayist recognized that the scene wherein the personality of Al Harrison thumped down the sign didn’t happen, in actuality; additionally, interviews with African-American ladies who worked at NASA around then uncovered that Katherine Johnson would not enter shaded washrooms in any case and visited those for white representatives, which proposes that the whole scene was compensated for accomplishing a sensational impact.
In this manner, it very well may be expressed that in spite of the way that Hidden Figures tried to bring up the issue of racial imbalance in such exceptionally viewed organizations as NASA, it didn’t portray functions that happened in the characters’ lives honestly. Here, emerges an issue of why such a decision was made and why the chief chose to give white men a more critical function in the battle for work environment balance at NASA than they really had. Everything goes down to a certain something: satisfying watchers. Neither white nor African-American watchers would have gotten a kick out of the chance to see that imbalance persevered and that the delegates of the larger part never really address it.
Mention that the functions in the film occurred three years after the death of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which proclaimed that separation and isolation were precluded: “to initiate suits to ensure sacred rights in open offices and government funded instruction, to expand the Commission on Civil Rights, to forestall segregation in governmentally helped programs, to set up a Commission on Equal Employment Opportunity, and for different purposes” (“Transcript of Civil Rights Act (1964)”). Accordingly, it very well may be presumed that in spite of the arrangement of the Civil Rights Act that didn’t uphold isolation and separation in the work environment, NASA kept on restricting the opportunity of its African-American female representatives based on bias. While Hidden Figures worked admirably in portraying imbalances, the endeavors of the film to mutilate the genuine picture were above all else impolite to the ones who needed to work under abusive work environment decides that upset their prosperity and profitability.
End
Shrouded Figures is a splendid film that shed light on the issue of work environment imbalance and the obstructions that African-American ladies needed to defeat to make progress. The film ought to be lauded for the emotional portrayal of functions and ground-breaking speeches that identify with the battles of ladies of shading. Nonetheless, in spite of the emotional impact, the genuine functions in Katherine Goble’s, Mary Jackson’s, and Dorothy Vaughan’s lives were misshaped so as to hoist the part of white men in the fight against imbalance while actually the ladies were as yet restricted in their forces and couldn’t appreciate similar opportunities that their partners had.