Coercion vs. Coaching: An Ethical Dilemma

Intimidation as a coaching tactic is unethical. The Bible emphasizes respect and love, even for those in positions of authority.

• Proverbs 29:2 says, “When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; But when a wicked man rules, the people groan.”

A coach who uses fear to control athletes isn’t acting righteously. True leadership inspires and motivates, not through fear.

Possible consequences of non-compliance:

• Reduced playing time
• More strenuous conditioning
• Verbal abuse
• Scholarship revocation (in extreme cases)

The NCAA Model and Coach Power:

The NCAA model does grant coaches significant power. Here’s a breakdown:

• Yes, coaches have significant control: High-profile coaches can wield immense influence over athletic departments and even recruiting decisions.
• Potential downsides: This power imbalance can lead to:
  • Exploitation of athletes who fear losing scholarships or playing time.
  • Coaches prioritizing winning over athlete well-being.
• NCAA role: The NCAA has rules to protect athletes, but enforcement can be uneven.

Is it too much power?

There’s ongoing debate. Here are some arguments:

• For reform: The current system prioritizes revenue and winning over athlete welfare.
• For the status quo: Coaches need control to maintain discipline and a winning program.

Christian Perspective:

From a Christian viewpoint, leaders should be servants, not tyrants (Mark 10:43-45). Coaches should use their power to develop athletes as people, not just players.

The Need for Change:

The NCAA model could benefit from:

• Stronger athlete protections
• Ensuring coaches prioritize education alongside athletics
• More balanced power dynamics

This would create a more ethical and Christ-centered environment for both coaches and athletes.