The major paper is designed to bring together three things: what you’ve learned through research and direct engagement about a culture different from your own, what you have learned about intercultural communication throughout this semester, and what you have learned through course work and discussions about of your own cultural identity and worldview. The paper should have the following parts:
1. Part I: An overview of some aspect of the chosen culture (a brief literature review) (be sure to cite at least 8 sources here). 4 pages
This literature review will be over festival that happen in Columbia and the traditions surrounding them
There is always a great festival happening every month in Colombia. Thanks to the vast diversity of traditions in each region, there are many festivals to celebrate heritage, music genres, traditional dances and even the production of flowers and coffee. The Carnival of Barranquilla is not only the second-largest carnival celebration in the world after the one in Rio de Janeiro. It is also the most prominent public and street celebration in Colombia. The Carnival offers a repertory of dances and musical expressions originating from the blend of various local traditions. Groups of masquerade dancers, actors, singers and instrumentalists delight crowds with theatrical and musical performances based on historical as well as current events.
regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pieces of data that can be put away in prompt (present moment) memory, how much data inside every one of those lumps can be very high, without unfavorably influencing the review of similar number