Description
Directions: Read the Costco case, Chapter 11, on pages 303 – 306. Use the Case Study Template to set up your case analysis paper. Organize your paper into the following sections
1. Introduction and Overview – Background of the problem, stakeholders – very brief overview
2. Identification of Main Issues/Problems/Questions
3. Analysis of Issues/Problems/Questions+Answer the case questions here too within the context of addressing problems, issues in the case.
4. Connection to course and outside readings (In text citations in the paper)
5. Conclusions?Recommendations – Solutions/Implementation Strategies
6. References – References from course and outside readings used in the paper
Case Questions – Answer these questions and other issues on the leadership model used (see the grading rubric) within the case setup specified above. DO NOT COPY THE QUESTIONS INTO YOUR CASE ANALYSIS:
1. Explain Costco’s success in terms of the three performance determinants in flexible
leadership theory (efficiency, adaptation, and human capital). HINT: Your textbook is one source for this information.
REMEMBER – THIS IS THE LEADERSHIP STYLE YOU ARE TO DISCUSS AND SHOW HOW IT IS DEMONSTRATED IN THE CASE!
2. Explain how Costco is able to provide higher compensation to its employees and still be successful
in the use of a low price competitive strategy.
3. Use relevant leadership theories to analyze the behavior of the CEO and describe his influence on the company.
Please see use the Case study template attached. Additionally, see Costco Case attached. Lastly be sure to cite and use the text book Leadership In Organizations, Eight Edition by Gary Yukl.
126750
31 minutes ago
Disregard these two files not associated with assignment IMG_0067.JPG and IMG_0069.JPG.
articles size expanded with expanding polymer focus [211, 212] and this might be because of expanding the grouping of broke up polymer brought about expanding natural stage thickness and lessening the proficiency of blending which caused development of the greater emulsion beads [213] and this can be additionally ascribed to that higher consistency that is unsurprising to build polymer – polymer and polymer-dissolvable collaborations [147, 214].
At the point when polymer focus on account of Eudragit S100 and HPMC Phthalate HP55 was expanded from 0.2 gm% to 0.8 gm% with Tween 80 grouping of 0.5% w/v and stage proportion of (1:2), molecule size was expanded from 390±9.4634 to 714±2.0548 and from 434±3.0912 to 863±0.9428 nm separately. A similar impact of polymer fixation on molecule size was the equivalent either on account of expanding Tween 80 focus and/or expanding the stage proportion as appeared in the tables (4, 6 and 8) and figures (3, 5 and 7).
At the point when polymer fixation on account of Eudragit S100 and HPMC Phthalate HP55 was expanded from 0.2 gm% to 0.8 gm% with Poloxamer 407 grouping of 0.5% w/v and stage proportion of (1:2), molecule size was expanded from 404±8.6538 to 747±1.6997 and from 598±1.633 to 905±4.0277 nm separately. A similar impact of polymer focus on molecule size was the equivalent either on account of expanding Poloxamer 407 fixation and/or expanding the stage proportion as appeared in the tables (5, 7 and 9) and figures (4, 6 and 8).
These outcomes were found to concur with the aftereffects of both Galindo-Rodriguez et al., 2004 [149] who arranged nanoparticles of Eudragit L100-55 utilizing nanoprecipitation technique to decide impact of polymer fixation on nanoparticle size utilizing diverse natural solvents and he found that in all cases, expanding polymer focus in natural stage brought about expanding mean size [149],and D. Quintanar-Guerrero et al., 1999 [215] who utilized emulsion-dissemination technique to get ready Eudragit E nanoparticles utilizing Eudragit E/ethyl acetic acid derivation/PVAL framework and cellulose acetic acid derivation phthalate (CAP)