As discussed in class, as I ordinarily do when I teach this course, I would assign you to go to one of Criminal
Courts in the City to observe live proceedings. Due to the ongoing situation with Covid, however, I still cannot
do that. As such, you will watch a video of part of the 2019 murder trial of former Dallas, Texas police officer
Amber Guyger, and then write about it. Guyger, who is white, was charged with murdering her Black neighbor,
Botham Jean. Guyger, who had just gone off-duty, testified at trial that when she shot Jean with her service
pistol she believed she was in her own apartment, and that Jean was an intruder. In fact, Guyger shot Jean—
who was unarmed—in his own apartment. The jury found Guyger guilty and she was sentenced to 10 years in
prison. The case was both very compelling and unusual: Jean’s brother publicly forgave Guyger; and in open
court, both Jean’s brother and the judge offered Guyger hugs, and the judge gave Guyger her personal Bible.
The following three links are your sources for this assignment:
Amber Guyger Gets 10-year Murder Sentence For Fatally Shooting Botham Jean, CNN, 10/3/19
[https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/02/us/amber-guyger-trial-sentencing/index.html]
Why a Judge Says She Gave Amber Guyger a Bible, a Hug and Hope of Redemption, New York Times,
10/7/19 [https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/07/us/tammy-kemp-amber-guyger.html?searchResultPosition=5
Video: Direct and cross-examination of Amber Guyger, ABC News, 9/28/19 [https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=J7IgyPh8UkQ]
Instructions:
1) Review both the New York Times and CNN articles for background on the case. Then watch the video of
Amber Guyger’s testimony. It runs about 3 hours (I realize it is somewhat lengthy, but bear in mind you do not
need to physically travel to and from court to complete the assignment). Note: The entire trial ran about 10
days, but because so few facts were genuinely at issue (e.g., Guyger admitted to shooting Jean), Guyger’s
testimony, and her explanation as to why she shot Jean is essentially the entire case. Also, as with any
Defendant who testifies at trial, Guyger is first questioned by her attorney (this is called direct examination),
and then is cross-examined by the prosecutor.
2) Write at least ten (10) things you learned about trials and/or courtroom proceedings from reviewing these
sources. Feel free to comment about anything. Here are some examples:
Did Guyger’s testimony seem credible or not credible, and why?
What did you think of the defense attorney and/or the prosecutor?
Was it inappropriate for the judge to give Guyger her Bible?
What did you think of the courtroom?
What did you think of the outcome of the case itself? Was justice done, or was the outcome an injustice?
Changes in Communication
GuidesorSubmit my paper for investigation
Web crazedI regularly attempt to appreciate social, social, political, moral, and different changes humankind has experienced all through hundreds of years of its reality and advancement. To a huge degree, these progressions were brought about by innovative advancement: new developments frequently changed the method for individuals’ lives and separately, the standards by which social orders lived. Planes, vehicles, PCs, versatile specialized gadgets, just as other mechanical marvels have changed the manner in which we think and live. In any case, what is considerably increasingly inquisitive, innovations have additionally transformed the manner in which we impart.
British chaps have a custom to discuss the climate when they meet a new (or even a commonplace) individual. Japanese individuals have various complex approaches to begin a discussion amiably. Numerous different countries additionally had their own guidelines of decorum; these standards permitted individuals to enter the correspondence procedure easily. Nonetheless, these days we can see that behavior is somewhat frequently disregarded for the proficiency of correspondence. The pace of regular day to day existence has expanded drastically contrasted even with the center of the twentieth century, and today individuals need to forfeit politeness for productiveness and effectiveness (IFResearch). Maybe, from the perspective of an individual from the 1950s, we would no doubt look like impolite and clear individuals, as we have gotten less worried about our way of life of correspondence, believing it to be bygone.
The time we live in is intriguing as far as the presence of in any event two degrees of language use; essentially, they are this present reality and computer generated reality (IDFS). The Internet has made it conceivable to move meaning, yet in addition the passionate palette and even pictures. A wide range of emojis in informal communities and emissaries effectively mitigate plain, insentient content; in addition, it happens frequently enough to send a photo or a picture record to account for yourself instead of depict your condition or circumstance in words (Instagram is an ideal case of how it functions). Web correspondence has additionally added to the improvement of an exceptional language layer: netspeak. It isn’t totally slang—it is fairly another advanced language that has developed from normal English, Spanish, Russian, and different dialects. Such neologisms as brb, LOL, u2, btw, cul8r, a/s/l, etc, alongside an adjusted utilization of sentence structure rules and different eccentricities structure a totally new culture of advanced correspondence. This isn’t to make reference to messaging (incidentally, another particular word) by means of PDAs and other portable devices.
Not just has the language of the Internet changed, yet additionally the language that we use every day. The cutting edge English language is consistently refreshed by the articulations that were obscure not exactly 10 years prior. For instance, such neologisms as “to PC face” signifies to toss speedy upset looks at the screen to make an impression of genuine work pressure. The expression “like-stun” is utilized to depict a state of an individual who has posted something in informal organizations and afterward accumulated an out of the blue tremendous measure of “likes” under it. Other unconventional terms, for example, “phantom post” or “Facebook-minute” have additionally showed up in the cutting edge English language because of the impact of PC advancements (Know-What). What’s more, however they exactly portray circumstances and conditions that numerous cutting edge individuals know about, their reality appears to be unimaginable out of the Internet-interchanges setting.
Correspondence today has experienced genuine changes, contrasted even with the center of the twentieth century. The pace of life has expanded, and along these lines lingual manners has additionally advanced. PC advances are known to have impacted current dialects the vast majority of all. Loads of neologisms, for example, cul8r or brb show up nearly every day. Additionally, the language of Internet correspondence, yet additionally standard language is evolving. A significant number of its terms, (for example, “to PC face” or “like-stun”) are well-known to individuals who regularly use PCs; be that as it may, envisioning them existing out of the setting of the Internet and PC innovations appears to be unthinkable.
References
Leerie, Susan. “The Modern History of Communications.” IFResearch. N.p., 02 Nov. 2010. Web. 17 Feb. 2014. internetfakeresearchbase.org/articles/web/correspondences/74330
Jones, Nathan. “Virtuality: The New Reality?” IDFS. N.p., 11 May 2013. Web. 17 Feb. 2014. <idfakescience.edu/articles/nathanjones/virtuality>.
“Present day Slang: What You Did Not Know.” Know-What. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Feb. 2014.
school article,