Court system
Address the following in a literature review of 2 pages.
TOPIC SELCTED: court system
What second topic have you selected for this assignment ? Explain.
How did you select the topic that you are researching? Explain
Now, select 8-10 scholarly sources, and conduct a literature review for this second topic.
Address the following in 2 pages:
Why is this topic important to the criminal justice system and the citizens of the United States? Explain.
What are various topic issues, problems, or policies associated with your selected topic? Explain in detail.
What do you propose as the changes to these topic issues, problems and policies? Explain.
Defend your changes with articulated support from legitimate peer-reviewed reference sources. This is absolute critical for your paper to be taken seriously
regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it's anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are 'recoded' and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller's unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi
Sample Solution
For my second topic for this assignment, I have selected the issue of how technology is changing the court system. The primary reason I chose this particular topic is because it is an important part of the legal landscape today, and it has been a growing source of discussion among both lawyers and non-lawyers alike. Technology can be used as a tool to make court proceedings more efficient, faster, and accurate in many ways. For example, using video conferencing during hearings can allow people from different places to participate without having to physically travel. Additionally, electronic filing systems that are connected to online databases make filing documents faster and easier than traditional paper filing methods (Janikowski & Fuhrer).
The inspiration for selecting this topic came from an article I read about how artificial intelligence may soon be used in courtroom decisions (Schuler). As technology advances further into our lives and businesses, it was interesting to note that even something as serious as a court case could potentially be influenced by these advancements. With all these potential changes on the horizon, coupled with some already underway such as digital evidence preservation platforms like Jencite Systems’ DigiGuardian (Eisenberg), researching how technology will shape the future of courts seemed both timely and relevant. Ultimately though, my main motivation for selecting this subject was my desire to explore what implications different technological advancements might bring when they meet up with one of our oldest forms of justice - namely courts - and what challenges or opportunities those developments could create.