Crime and deviance

 

Critically compare three major sociological explanations in explaining illegal drug use.

Sample Solution

Crime and deviance

To know how to reduce drug use, we must first know what explains it. The major explanations for drug use come from the fields of biology, psychology, and sociology. Sociological explanations emphasize the importance of certain aspects of the social environment – social structure, social bonds to family and school, social interaction, and culture – or drug use, depending on the type of drug. The three major sociological explanations in explaining illegal drug use include: functionalism, conflict theory, and symbolic interactionism. Functionalism – drug use is functional for several parties in society. It provides drug users the various positive physiological effects that drugs have. At the same time, both legal drugs and illegal drugs contribute to dysfunctions in society. Conflict theory – much drug use in poor urban areas results from the poverty, racial inequality, and other conditions affecting people in these locations.

Parts of the Communication Process; Interpersonal Communication There are seven essential components in relational correspondence. These components exist at whatever point we cooperate somehow or another. The quintessence of these components is that they are firmly related and progress in an occasional procedure. It is one. DeVito says that there are consistently wellsprings of data when two individuals convey. The originator is the wellspring of the message and is answerable for encoding the message and offering significance to the message (DeVito, 2013). The beneficiary of the message being gotten by the cove is the beneficiary. Relational correspondence is a significant part of life. Notwithstanding trading data among individuals associated with the correspondence procedure, there are other significant parts of correspondence between individuals (West, 2011). Collaboration of relational relationship assists individuals with gaining thoughts and relational abilities through the correspondence procedure (DeVito, 2009). All the more significantly, when utilizing relational correspondence, the gatherings engaged with the correspondence procedure are bound to communicate their feelings and feelings. Along these lines, the utilization of innovation during the time spent relational correspondence is still significant and assumes a significant job in the public eye (Wood, 2010). As per a study of April 2012, in the previous 30 days, about 70% of cell phone clients and 86% of cell phone clients are leading at any rate one of the accompanying exercises. Subject 9 Interpersonal relationship  What is relational correspondence? Relational correspondence  Interpersonal correspondence is the way toward imparting, conveying, and haggling between the two individuals. Relational correspondence  What is the hypothetical perspective about relational correspondence? Relational correspondence in the 1960’s  Learning, disagreement, balance, social judgment, response. ● Speech and social impact relational relationship From the late 1960s to the mid 1970s ● Self articulation, self divulgence, relational connections, nonverbal correspondence and relationship improvement. ● Development of relational connections and relational connections Interpersonal correspondence in the mid 1970s