Crime control models

There are two models of criminal process. The crime control model focuses on efficiency and controlling crime while promoting public safety. The due process model focuses on having a fair system that protects the constitutional rights of an individual. How do these two models compare and contrast? Do you think one model is more important than the other? Do you think the nature of a countries’ government or political system has an impact on whether it tilts more toward a crime control versus a due process orientation? Please provide an example to support your view.

Sample Answer

The continuum of care is one of the concepts that is applied to prevent the limitations within the system. As such, continuum of care can be defined as a range of services developed and organized to address the variety of needs individuals have as they age. This system recognizes and appreciates the availability and extent of short term and long-term care systems and services in the community and in the institutional settings. Suh healthcare programs include in-home care, community programs among others. United States is at the center of meeting the goal of continuum care. And this paper exploits how effective the attainment has been for US.

Wars have gone on since the beginning of time, it appears. They are horrible and calamitous, yet we appear to not realize how to prevent them from occurring. As individuals who have seen overall wars for perhaps our whole lives, it is a great idea to introspect about the purposes for wars. Wars are not generally directed in light of outrage, envy, hatred, or detest. There is an alleged "simply war." For example, the United States Marines portray these purpose behind war: "Prompt resistance of the country (reaction to an assault) 2) Control of crude materials 3) Control of methods for creation 4) Control of exchange highways 5) Control of exchange benefits 6) Treaty commitments including the above in the country's eventual benefits" (The Economist). We will really expound on these causes in the accompanying sections.

Safeguarding one's country from attack is the most fair and good purpose behind war, by most norms. A country fighting back against an assault on its kin and national outskirts is ensuring its residents and national personality. There is a guiltlessness in being an injured individual and hitting back at the individuals who have hurt you. In spite of the fact that the Christian convention depends on pardoning, and most western nations occupied with wars are "Christian countries," retaliating against an intrusion or direct assault on a country is viewed as the most simply type of war (BBC).

Picking up as well as keeping up command over crude materials is another key explanation behind wars to be begun and continued. As the site Modern Diplomacy expresses, "The war for crude materials adds up to a reshuffling of the force relations among Western countries, on one hand, and the rising or potentially creating countries, on the other. The ascent of China, BRICS, and the becoming stronger of the sovereign riches assets of Arab countries, which are oil exporters, gives the proof. Assets are ground-breaking weapons in monetary fighting, and everything proposes that the contention will just increase. The International Energy Agency assesses that world interest for vitality will increment by half from this point until 2030, particularly attributable to the development of India and China" (Giuseppe, Gagliano). A few people say that most wars are battled about crude materials, as they make a country solid and practical.

Identifying with participating in war over crude materials, controlling the methods for generation is likewise over the rundown. The generation of materials is particularly significant for a nation's economy, and acts against a country's creation of materials can be viewed as a commitment of war. In this manner, numerous countries, when confronted with a genuine risk to their economy through a hostile on their methods for creation, participate in war.

Another monetary explanation, the control of exchange courses, is a progressively customary motivation to direct a war. Exchange courses have been adaptable and adaptable since the age of the Internet, however the greater part of the exchange of the world is as yet done by dispatch (United Nations). Along these lines, the control of exchange courses via ocean is as yet fundamental. In any case, much exchange that isn't managing crude materials can be sent through the Internet. In the event that a nation removes the exchange courses of another nation, the defrauded nation is obligated to counter this activity.

As you would have seen, there has been an example of monetary favorable circumstances or burdens, and taking part in war dependent on these premises. One more financial motivation to begin a war is the control of exchange benefits. War can expand exchange with another partnered country, or it can battle the abatement, or looming decline, in exchange benefits. Enduring monetarily can mean the possible demise of a country, so it is reasonable for do battle for financial reasons.

At last, moving ceaselessly from monetary reasons, wars additionally occur because of commitments to arrangements. The first and second universal wars can be said to be arrangement based wars, for instance. These arrangements are an indication of ideological connections among nations and ensuring their inclinations. Nations make settlements for a few reasons, yet one of them is the insurance of nations' fringes by military power.

As it very well may be seen, war is normally attached to monetary, ideological, and nationalistic ideas. A "simply war" did not depend on feelings, but instead on keeping the success of said nations. With every one of these explanations behind war, it would seem that there is no purpose behind wars to end in the coming century.


"Why Wars Happen." The Economist, The Economist Newspaper, 16 Dec. 2008,

"Morals – War: What Is a 'Noble motivation'?" BBC, BBC,

Giuseppe, Gagliano. "The War for Raw Materials." Modern Diplomacy, 25 Feb. 2018, materials/.

"" United Nations, United Nations,