The criminal trial process has many components. In this assignment, you explore real-life examples of the criminal trial process in two different types of trials.
Search the Internet for trials using parameters such as but not limited to “watch criminal trials online,” or visit the Wild About Trial website.
Compare two trials. If possible, compare a murder trial with one involving another major felony. Include the parties represented in each trial (i.e., plaintiff and defendant).
Write 350- to 700-word comparison in which you:
Summarize what each trial was about.
Identify the type of court the trials were held in (refer to Ch. 1 for types of courts in the United States).
Describe as many of the steps of each trial as you can (refer to Ch. 13 for the steps/process).
Explain the similarities and differences between the two trials you selected.
Identify as many of the actors of each trial as you can who played a role in the steps of the trial process. What were their roles?
prepared from polycarboxylic acid were solid matrix encapsulating drug, little drug released. As they reach the small intestine, the pH changes from acidic to neutral (6–7.4), carboxylic acid groups deprotonated, the linear polymers dissolved and drugs released rapidly.
2- Drug releases when the polymers swell at specific pH conditions:
Another reason for drug release from nanoparticles was the swelling of the materials [96].
At low pH, the polymers, particularly cross-linked polymers, have a compact structure, which considerably decreased the porosity of the matrix. This caused a slower release of drug as a result of the greater resistance for diffusion of the drug out of the nanogel. However, at higher pH, the nanogel particles were in a swollen state with a higher porosity that favored the release of the drug because of the reduction in diffusion resistance.
3- The drug releases as a result of both polymer dissolution and swelling:
There was obscure boundary between drug dissolution and swelling for the carriers. Some nanoparticle systems might release drug through both the mechanisms. Li et al., 2006 [97] studied the release of insulin from chitosan–Eudragit L100-55 nanoparticles in vitro. The results proposed that at low pH, the nanoparticles were covered by Eudragit L100-55, little water permeated into the particles and when the pH value was elevated to 5.8, Eudragit L100-55 dissolved and water penetrated to the core of the particles. The particle size become larger as chitosan swelling and the higher porosity of chitosan caused rapid insulin release.