Critical Thinking Assignment

 

Explain how nations can enhance their competitive advantage. What are the determinants of national competitiveness? Provide at least one example of a country with successful national industrial policies.

Sample Solution

Competitive advantage (CA) is an advantage competitor gain by providing or offering customers or consumers greater value for their money through product and service differentiation or through lower prices. Maintaining competitive advantage is crucial to many businesses or organizations’ success in order to survive in the market. In this paper, I will

Barthes (1964) upheld the ideas of language, or the piece of the Semiological framework which is assented upon by society, and discourse, or the individual selection of images, to Semiological frameworks. The use of these ideas can be provided to the Semiological investigation of the nourishment framework. As indicated by Barthes (1964), somebody is allowed to make his/her own menu, utilizing individual decisions in nourishment blends, and this will end up being their discourse or message. This is finished with the general national and social structures of the language of nourishment mind. Barthes (1964) at that point spread on Saussure’s footing, by clarifying that language isn’t generally socially controlled by the majority, yet is now and then chose by a specific moment gathering of people, to some degree changing the connection of language and discourse. Barthes (1964) precise that a Semiological framework can critically exist in which there is language, however next to zero discourse. Right now, (1964) was of the accept that a third component called matter, which would give implication would should be added to the language/discourse framework.

Signifier and Signified

The connoted was a portrayal of an idea, while the signifier was utilized to speak to the sound-picture of that idea. Barthes (1964) calls attention to that the significance of both the connoted and the signifier is the connection that exists between them; it is inside this relationship that sense is shown up at. “… that the words in the field get their importance just from their resistance to another (for the most part two by two), and that if these restrictions are saved, the significance is unambiguous” (Barthes, 1964, p. 38). Out of the relationship, the sign is made. Saussure (1959) demonstrated the sign to be discretionary in nature, at first dependent on the connection between the connoted and signifier. Barthes (1964) clarified that the sign can’t be subjective always when Semiological frameworks are imagined. Rather, Barthes gives that once indication accept a job or use, it will acquire its significance along the line. The sign can lose its eccentric in nature and become impelled (Barthes, 1964).

Syntagm and System

Barthes (1964) characterizes the Syntagm as a stretched blend of signs. Inside semantic examinations, this would be something like a sentence, where each is interwined to different terms inside the expression. The Syntagm is compared to the framework, which implies different words inside the psyche, as on account of the relations among “learning” and “temporary position” (Barthes, 1964, p. 58). Barthes goes further upon these psyches by interfacing them Semiologically to various frameworks, for example nourishment. In nourishment framework, the orderly level turns into the different packs inside a specific level (for example sorts of pastries), while the syntagmatic level turns into the menu decisions chose for a full feast (Barthes, 1964).

This question has been answered.

Get Answer