Cultural relativism
Apply a concept, principle, or theory from anthropology to a subject of your choice.
Please see the attached list of anthropological concepts for ideas.
In order to fully meet the requirements of this assignment, please do the following:
title your paper using BOTH the CONCEPT and the TOPIC (for example, "An Explanation of Jihad via the
Sapir Whorf Hypothesis" or "the Acculturation of the Chickasaw People")
define your concept, principle, or theory from an anthropological source
make your concept, principle, or theory the focus of your thesis statement
put your thesis statement in bold at the end of your introductory paragraph
choose a topic that sincerely interests you
cite your sources throughout the body of your paper
include a Works Cited list at the end of the paper
use at least three scholarly anthropological sources (and as many other, non-scholarly sources as you wish, as
long as they're credible) The Concept Paper assignment asks you to apply a concept, principle, or theory from
anthropology to a particular culture or society. Below is a list of terms that work well for this assignment.
Define these terms—many are defined and used differently
outside our discipline!
scientific method
holism
cultural relativism
ethnocentrism
culture-bound theory
anthropometry
emic/etic
pluralism
enculturation
integration
explicit/implicit culture
acculturation
diffusion
syncretism
the case against race
natural selection
mutation
gene flow
random genetic drift
behavioral modernity
garbology
foraging (hunter-gatherer)
Broad-Spectrum Revolution
cultivation
domestication
horticulture
pastoralism
intensive agriculture
industrial agriculture
band
tribe
chiefdom
state
strength theory
compatibility with childcare theory
economy of effort theory
expendability theory
kinship
matrilineal/patrilineal
extended/nuclear family
matrilocal/patrilocal/neolocal
polygyny/polyandry
bride price
bride service
dowry
generalized reciprocity
balanced reciprocity
3/27/2020 Order 314514964
https://admin.writerbay.com/orders_available?subcom=detailed&id=314514964 3/4
negative reciprocity
potlatch
domestic production
industrialism
post-industrialism
communitas
interpretive drift
forces
beings
mana
shaman
priest
medium
physiological experiences
witchcraft
sorcery
divination
magic
ritual
ceremony
rite of passage
separation
transition
limnality
folklore
colonialism
proletarianism
industrialism
globalization
neoliberalism
commoditization
world system theory
core countries
semiperiphery countries
periphery countries
symbolic communication
displacement
language acquisition
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
kinesics
phoneme
morpheme
syntax
descriptive linguistics
historical linguistics
sociolinguistics
applied anthropology
forensic anthropology
development anthropology
understood understanding alone, as 'Nothing demonstrated can be'. The glaring difference between the action words 'suspected' and 'demonstrated' confirmations the delicate condition of a youthful imperial; something can so effectively be suspected, however so troublesomely demonstrated. There is likewise sharp differentiation between the initial expressions of each line, 'Much' and 'nothing'. Obviously, this wit alludes to an absence of proof yet an abundance of allegations. These restrictions improve the irresoluteness of its creators circumstance; so much potential for power, yet so much helplessness.
Some may contend that obstruction right now conditional – however the action word and the modifier are, to a degree, totally unrelated. Lisa Hopkins stays resolute that in spite of flashes of solidarity, by and large, 'Elizabeth feels less allowed to submit herself. To be sure, I will propose that Elizabeth was, indeed, anxious of composing on the grounds that during a time of uncertainty and wit, it offered such a large number of prisoners to fortune'. I consent to a degree with Hopkins – Elizabeth was anxious, at the same time, on the off chance that anything, pleasantries and ambiguities took into consideration the Queen's best unpretentious corresponds. Hopkins does later acknowledge this perspective be that as it may; 'ambiguities and intriguingness were qualities instead of debilitations'. This matches my line of contention: Elizabeth utilized ambiguous abstract gadgets – ambiguities, pleasantry, grammar – to show obstruction when she was at her generally limited.
In later mottos, the Queen legitimately addresses sexual orientation develops to show her obstruction. In 'Rebellion of Fortune' (1589) for instance, there exists that the Queen was gotten between the certainty of fortune and requirements of her sex: 'Never figure you fortune can tolerate the influence/Where goodness' power can make her comply'. In fact, the sonnet requests that fortune not be so resolute in the influence of its wheel, 'bear the influence', as the weight of 'temperance's power' (her feminized desires), can be prevailing. Strikingly, the hesitance saw in Elizabeth's before, most powerless motto has on the whole vanished. Elizabeth is spoken to as effectively announcing that she will not be uninvolved and leave her destiny to risk. This is made conceivable by the adjustment in power relationship to her crowd. By this point, Elizabeth's capacity as England's ruler takes into consideration an increasingly dynamic refrain, in spite of the fact that oneself belittling tone which asserts her sex may in any case constrain her capacity remains. I accept anyway that permission of her 'powerless' sex is itself an indication of opposition. She is by and by not permitting potential adversaries to search out issues when she herself has arranged them.
In different sonnets tending to a worldwide crowd, Elizabeth correspondingly handles gendered ideas. In 'The Doubt of Future Foes' (1571), a sonnet about the connections between political adversaries, Elizabeth closes a testing sonnet with a ground-breaking rhyming couplet: 'My corroded sword throu