Current guidelines or best practices relating to your proposed solution

 

Research best practices to identify an effective intervention for your selected problem. Your goal is to gather evidence from scholarly literature to support the most effective intervention strategy.

The performance appraisal tools in this week’s learning activities will help you determine appropriate scholarly sources of evidence to cite.

Locate at least 3 original research articles that support your proposed solution to your selected problem.

The articles must be peer-reviewed, published within the past 5 years, and statistically significant.
To begin, write a 350-word summary of each article in which you:

Identify current guidelines or best practices relating to your proposed solution, or if there are protocols, the current standard of care.
Define your proposed intervention(s) to address the problem.
Explain how the intervention will result in a solution to the problem

Sample Solution

“Shaping the research agenda, and stimulating the development, distribution, and application of knowledge” is one of WHO’s five main responsibilities. This function emphasizes the value of information in developing health plans at the national and international levels as well as in improving the effectiveness of health system operations. Additionally, people must have access to trustworthy information about health hazards and how to minimize them. In order to perform this essential job more effectively and efficiently, WHO acknowledges the significance of knowledge management techniques and tools. At its 56th session in 2006, the WHO Regional Committee for Africa issued a resolution on knowledge management and related strategic directions (KM)

la argues after a war, it is the responsibility of the leader to judge what to do with the enemy (Begby et al (2006b), Page 332).. Again, proportionality is emphasised. For example, the Versailles treaty imposed after the First World War is questionably too harsh, as it was not all Germany’s fault for the war. This is supported by Frowe, who expresses two views in jus post bellum: Minimalism and Maximalism, which are very differing views. Minimalists suggest a more lenient approach while maximalist, supporting the above example, provides a harsher approach, punishing the enemy both economically and politically (Frowe (2010), Page 208). At the last instance, however, the aim of war is to establish peace security, so whatever needs to be done can be morally justified, if it follows the rules of jus ad bellum.
In conclusion, just war theory is very contestable and can argue in different ways. However, the establishment of a just peace is crucial, making all war type situation to have different ways of approaching (Frowe (2010), Page 227). Nevertheless, the just war theory comprises of jus ad bellum, jus in bello and jus post bellum, and it can be either morally controversial or justifiable depending on the proportionality of the circumstance. Therefore, there cannot be one definitive theory of the just war but only a theoretical guide to show how wars should be fought, showing normativity in its account, which answers the question to what a just war theory is.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.