Decision making process

at
Categories
Tags

1. Reflect on your decision making process as you were considering whether or not to cheat
on your assignment.
a. What factors contributed to the situation and your ultimate decision to cheat?
b. Did you consider the consequences you may face when making the decision to
cheat? If so, what did you think they would be?
c. What other options did you consider? What would the consequences had been if
you would have selected one of the other options?
d. What consequences are you facing as a result of your actions (please be specific)
and how do the consequences relate to the choice you made?
2. How have you been impacted by your behavior in this situation? Is there anyone else
who was impacted or potentially impacted by your decision to cheat on your assignment?
In what ways?
3. What have you learned as a result of going through the student conduct process?
4. If you were faced with the same scenario again, would you make a different choice? If
yes, what choice would you make? If no, why not? What will you change in the future
if anything in light of this experience? Be specific.
5. What steps, if any, have you already taken to fix any negative impact of this incident?
6. What does integrity mean to you?
a. Give examples of at least three instances when you rely on the integrity of others.
b. Give three examples when others rely on your integrity.
This assignment should follow this format:
• Typed in the APA or MLA format
• 12 point, Times New Roman font, double spaced
• One inch margins
• Header on every page with your last name only
• Numbered pages
• Include a cover page with your name, the date and the title of your paper (the title page does
not count as a page of your assignment).

Sample Solution

The tools they employ to manage client portfolios differ little from the portfolio management software already widely used in the profession. The main difference is in distribution channel. Until recently, portfolio management was almost exclusively conducted through human advisors and sold in a bundle with other services. Now, consumers can access the portfolio management tools directly, in the same way that they have obtained access to brokerage houses like Charles Schwab and stock trading services with the advent of the Internet. Roboadvisors are extending into new business avenues.
The customer acquisition costs and time constraints faced by traditional human advisors have left many middle-class investors who are underadvised to get a better advice to invest in the portfolio with help of the robo advisors easily. The average financial planner has a minimum investment amount of $50,000,while minimum investment amounts for robo-advisors start as low as $500 in the United States and as low as £1 in the United Kingdom. In addition to having lower minimums on investable assets compared to traditional human advisors, robo-advisors charge fees ranging from 0.2% to 1.0% of Assets Under Management while traditional financial planners charged average fees of 1.35% of Assets Under Management according to a survey conducted by AdvisoryHQ News.
In the United States, robo-advisors should be registered investment advisors, which are regulated be Security and Exchange Commission (SEC). In the United Kingdom they are regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.
Hi, how can I help?