Deconstructing internalized privilege and oppression

 

“ Those who fail to learn from history are condemned to repeat it.” George Santayana
The passage of time makes it easy for many to dismiss the oppressive act of society and to minimize its impact. “ That was a long time ago “ , “ Yes but we have come so far, and things have changed “ “ What’s that got to do with me ? “ or “ that just one terrible thing that happened “ are responses often given when people ty to talk about the impact of systemic oppression.
Choose one event from 2 (two) different timelines that we explored in the course and answer the following for each event:
1) a) Make the title of your infographic the names of the two timelines that you have selected.
b) Quote the event as it is stated on the timeline including the date.
c) Research and add at least 2 additional facts surrounding the event not mentioned in the quote/timeline.
5 points
2) Describe the negative impact of this event on the targeted group. (2-3 impacts)
a) What was the immediate negative impact
b) What was the negative impact on future members of that targeted group? 6 poin
3) What dominant groups or segments of society at the time of the event do you think benefitted from the oppressive event and how (point out 2-3 ways) 5 Points
4) Explain the similarities in terms of impact or methods used that your chosen events have with each other. Make specific linkages to each other not just about the fact that they are oppressive or discrimination.

Sample Solution

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pieces of data that can be put away in prompt (present moment) memory, how much data inside every one of those lumps can be very high, without unfavorably influencing the review of similar number

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.