Sample Solution

ncluding Tullus Hostilius and Ancus Martius. Very little is said about these rulers other than how they vanquished people groups in the encompassing region of Rome, this shows relying upon who was in charge in the midst of total principle demonstrated whether Rome was extending forcefully or not. This composing additionally shows that there was noteworthy development happening right now. (Livy 161) Beyond this period into the Republic it has all the earmarks of being a significant part of a similar pattern, struggle that prompts extension despite the fact that the Republic’s aims were increasingly confounded as force was not concentrated to one man.

The Punic Wars were an exorbitant case of how Roman extension filled in as an impetus for additional contentions with other huge powers in Europe and North Africa. The Punic Wars demonstrated how war could bring about the extension of region however at a precarious expense in time, cash, and life; subsequently Rome procured southern Italy, region in North Africa, and Spain. The Second Punic War wherein Hannibal endeavored to vanquish Rome by moving his military all through Western Europe is an ideal case of how Rome did battle due to legitimate need, shielding them from a forceful force. It additionally demonstrated that Rome was not strong, having lost a few fights, for example, that at Lake Trasimene and Cannae seriously against Hannibal’s military. Cornelius Nepos states, “In the wake of having taken on the conflict, Hannibal progressed upon Rome without opposition. He ended in the slopes close to the city… But Hannibal, in spite of the fact that trapped in a pollute, removed himself around evening time without the loss of any of his men, and along these lines deceived Fabius, that generally capable of officers.” (Nepos 22) This entry shows us the danger that confronted Rome during this war, the ability and ability that Hannibal showed as a general. His contempt for Rome was fed by the past clashes and his activities were that of hostility t