Read the following case history. Describe how a psychologist would explain the cause of Andrea’s problem using each of the Behavioural, Cognitive, Socio-cultural, and Psychodynamic perspectives. Be sure to include the names of people who were most important in developing the perspective (if known) and any key terms and concepts associated with the perspective.
Do not rely on common sense and intuition in discussing this case. Make your argument for each perspective as if you were an advocate of this particular viewpoint.
Your responses should be double spaced and in complete sentences. Aim for 100-140 words in each description.
Andrea is a 19-year-old college student. She has requested counseling from her college counseling center at the urging of her friends. Andrea’s friends believe that she may have an eating disorder. Andrea sees herself as fat, but to her friends she is startlingly thin. In fact, she is so thin that they are afraid that she will become seriously ill. Andrea maintains this low weight mainly by eating practically nothing and drinking two quarts of water a day. She says that she thinks about food “all the time” when she is restricting her food intake, but that she does not want to eat because she is afraid of getting fat. At other times, however, her hunger is so intense that she feels like she has to give in to her cravings. At those times she “binges” and eats huge amounts of food. For example, she once ate a half gallon of ice cream in a little over an hour. After her “binges” she works to get rid of the excess calories she has consumed by vomiting. She says she is starting to agree that she may have an eating problem. After interviewing Andrea, you are convinced that she meets the criteria for diagnoses of both anorexia and bulimia.
You are also interested in obtaining some background information about Andrea, to aid in understanding her. You find out that Andrea is 19 years old and a freshman at college. She says that she started really worrying about her weight two years ago, when she was a junior in high school. At that time her parents were quarreling a lot and had even talked about divorce. She says that managing her eating made her feel more in control. She also noticed that, even though she still felt fat, people seemed to pay more attention to her and respond to her better as she got thinner. She indicates that she likes having a more athletic figure.
Developmental psychology is the branch of psychology that focuses on how people grow and evolve with in their lifetime. Those who specialize in this field are not just concerned with the physical changes that occur as people grow; they also look at the social, emotional, and cognitive development that occurs throughout life. Change is inevitable. As humans, we constantly grow throughout our lifespans, from conception to death. Psychologists strive to understand and explain how and why people change throughout life. While many of these changes are normal and expected, they can still pose challenges that people sometimes need extra assistance to manage.
in IRA violence, that was not entirely the case. Giving a nonviolent party with ties to a paramilitary political access only legitimized what the IRA was doing by demonstrating a large amount electoral support. It was no secret that Sinn Fein and the IRA were linked, and in the 1980s, a significant amount of the nationalist population voted for them despite the small numbers of extremists that supported the IRA. With seats in Parliament, Sinn Fein could limit the amount of harsh policies targeting the paramilitary branch (Neumann 2005, 952). Based on the electoral statistics of Sinn Fein in the 1980s, the party did better politically when the IRA was viewed as nonviolent. In both elections (1982 and 1987), the violence and IRA attacks did not diminish based on how well Sinn Fein did in the polls. Sinn Fein’s popularity depended greatly on public image, and less of what was happening internally; this was boosted to a more positive light when Bobby Sands was elected, as he was already a popular figure worldwide.
Throughout the Troubles, support of the IRA increased when large-scale grievances were placed upon on the nationalists, such as the death toll on Bloody Sunday. The 1960s established a narrative of collective victimhood for the Catholic minority and many nationalists, which stood as a platform for the hunger strikers to build-up on and create a more positive image of the IRA and the “freedom fighters” that were apart of the organization. Because of this, Sinn Fein became a popular political party bolstered by a public image of non-violence despite what was happening and not reported on behind the scenes. When the IRA did not come across as a terrorist organization, they were better supported (in Ireland and internationally), as it was easier for both moderates and extremists to get behind this group as their violent acts were diminished in the narrative that honored and “glorified” those who died in the Bloody Sunday and the hunger strikes as freedom fighters and martyrs.