Explain the difference between modifications and accommodations. Discuss how accommodations can serve as a pre-referral intervention and provide two examples of accommodations you might commonly make prior to referring the student to a child study team. In replies to peers, provide additional examples of accommodations that have not already been discussed.
Difference between modifications and accommodations
Modifications change “what” is learned and therefore change the content of the grade-specific curriculum. For example, a student who struggles with spelling may be tested on a different set of words than his peers. An accommodation is a change that helps a student overcome or work around the disability. These changes are typically physical or environmental changes. An example of accommodation is offering an audio version of classroom text for a student with dyslexia or visual supports for children with ASD. Accommodation can serve as a pre-referral intervention. The purpose of the pre-referral process is to ensure your child tries reasonable accommodations and modifications before she is referred for special education assessment.
rnt that their best resource, in examination with the public authority, is that they are not in danger of predisposition from legal targets.
At long last, I coordinated a conversation bunch with agents of various ages and foundations to acquire a more extensive point of view on this issue. I assembled a scope of understudies from my school on Wednesday 23rd June 2018 and suggested conversation starters including capital punishment and basic freedoms. I discovered that the vast majority pushed for the mix of the law and public strain gatherings to shield the right to life.
Examination and assessment
The right to life isn’t simply a right; an ethical standard shields the conservation of human existence. State run administrations are ordinarily credited to being the fundamental danger to one side to life , because of their utilization of capital punishment.
While resolving an inquiry with respect to one side to life, it is unavoidable that the more broad issue of basic liberties will emerge. As previously mentioned, the UDHR plays had a vital impact in mentalities towards basic freedoms. Be that as it may, this has not all been positive. While creating the handout, I was presented to the issue of social relativism. Social relativism expresses that a few practices are ‘excluded from genuine analysis from untouchables.’ The UDHR incorporates an article that precludes torment. In any case, female genital mutilation is considered by some as a type of torment and others as a social practice. Accordingly, the UDHR should be visible as constraining Western thoughts onto the remainder of the world. Then again, it is viewed as setting out wide standards and just contribution rules. Accordingly, I was presented to the worldwide viewpoints in regards to the protection of common freedoms.
The historical backdrop of worldwide regulation in regards to capital punishment ought to be considered as it represents the really impact in context and demonstrates the way that the law can safeguard the right to life. In the meeting, I was informed that in 1994, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe prescribe that a further convention to the