Effective transformational leader that you know and an effective servant leader

 

1) Describe an effective transformational leader that you know and an effective servant leader. How does these leaders exemplify the principles of each leadership style and French and Raven’s sources (bases) of power (influence)?

2) Evaluate the strengths/limitations of the specific leadership style of that person in the situation they were in.

3) Based on this analysis, what leadership style will be most effective for you in the role you are preparing to do and why?

 

Sample Solution

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

An effective transformational leader that I know is my manager at work. She consistently demonstrates effective leadership qualities such as setting a clear vision for the team, inspiring and motivating others to strive for excellence, and providing guidance and support in order to achieve our goals. Her sources of power include reward power (she’s able to recognize employee efforts through rewards or recognition), coercive power (she will remove/replace an employee if they are not meeting expectations), legitimate power (by being appointed as the manager she has authority over her team), expert power (she has a wealth of knowledge in her field which gives her influence over decisions) and referent power (the respect she has from colleagues due to her hard work).

 

 

 

 

By and large, “”In old Greece and Rome, before the approaching of Christianity, perspectives toward child murder, dynamic willful extermination, and self destruction had would in general be lenient. Numerous old Greeks and Romans had no fittingly characterized confidence in the intrinsic worth of individual human existence, and agnostic doctors probably performed regular early terminations as well as both deliberate and compulsory benevolence killings. Albeit the Hippocratic Vow restricted specialists from giving ‘a dangerous medication to anyone, not regardless of whether requested,’ or from recommending such a game-plan, barely any old Greek or Roman doctors followed the pledge steadfastly. All through old style relic, there was broad help for deliberate demise rather than delayed anguish, and doctors agreed by frequently giving their patients the toxins they mentioned.” (Dowbiggin) Despite the fact that doctors in old times made a similar vow to save lives, they actually gave out toxins to kill patients. Some say that the justification behind the doctors’ activities were on the grounds that Christianity hadn’t been laid out yet. Thus, the rule of “Thall will not kill,” had not yet been composed.

“Since old times, Jewish and Christian scholars have gone against self destruction as conflicting with the human great and with obligations to God. In the thirteenth hundred years, Thomas Aquinas embraced Catholic showing self destruction in contentions that would impact Christian idea about self destruction for quite a long time. Aquinas denounced self destruction as off-base since it contradicts one’s obligation to oneself and the regular tendency of self-propagation; since it harms others and the local area of which the individual is a section; and in light of the fact that it disregards God’s power over life, which is God’s gift. This position exemplified perspectives about self destruction that won from the Medieval times through the Renaissance and Reconstruction.” (ProCon.org) Despite the fact that the discussion is normally about doctor helped self destruction, the truth of the matter is that the patients are as yet commiting self destruction. In the event that an individual who is of sound psyche and can simply decide, in the event that they are introducing self-destructive considerations, policing each option to mediate the endeavor. On the off chance that that is the situation with regular individuals, for what reason would it be advisable for it be any unique for individuals who are wiped out and in the clinic. Assuming that equivalent individual who was wiped out was out on the planet, and came dependent upon somebody and requested that that individual assist with committing suicide since they essentially don’t have any desire to live any longer, the individual likely wouldn’t help them.

During the late eighteenth Hundred years, “The dismissal of self destruction and willful extermination stayed firm, even after large numbers of the new states decriminalized self destruction following the Progressive Conflict. Most of Americans dismissed self destruction’s precedent-based regulation discipline… yet regardless of how thoughtful they were toward the self destruction’s family, most Americans halted far shy of excusing self-murder. As late as the before the war period there existed in the US a firm agreement… against self destruction and benevolence killing.” (Dowbiggin)

In 1999, a case is Michigan sentenced Jack Kevorkian, MD, of homicide. He was the essential ca

This question has been answered.

Get Answer