Employee recognition programs

 

 

Conduct research on a company other than your own to compose a comprehensive summary to discuss each of the following questions:

1. Discuss three (3) reasons that companies design and implement recognition and reward programs and explain how positive recognition benefits employees and companies.

2. Identify the best practices that should be incorporated in a program to recognize and reward employees.

3. Based on the company you selected, what recommendations do you have to improve their employee recognition program? Provide justification for how your recommendations would benefit the employees and the company.

4. What aspects of this company’s employee recognition program would you like to see implemented in your company? Provide justification for how your recommendations would benefit the employees and the company.

 

Sample Solution

In today`s world, recognizing employees is very different from the recognitions of the old days; no longer are we restricted to giving out watches, pins and coffee mugs on yearly work anniversaries. While these types of gifts are still in the picture, today`s workforce is better engaged in the moment than in the future. So, why start a rewards and recognition program? Doing so will: increase motivation, encourage friendly competition, and improve productivity. Offering recognition and rewards for employee performance will boost motivation so workers stay on track and maintain a positive attitude. These programs encourage collaboration and give employees something to work toward. When they receive a reward for doing something right, they will be more motivated to do it again and again.

Since antiquated times, Jewish and Christian masterminds have gone against self destruction as conflicting with the human great and with obligations to God. In the thirteenth hundred years, Thomas Aquinas upheld Catholic showing self destruction in contentions that would deeply impact Christian idea about self destruction for a really long time. Aquinas censured self destruction as off-base since it negates one’s obligation to oneself and the regular tendency of self-propagation; since it harms others and the local area of which the individual is a section; and on the grounds that it disregards God’s power over life, which is God’s gift. This position exemplified perspectives about self destruction that won from the Medieval times through the Renaissance and Reconstruction.” (ProCon.org) Despite the fact that the discussion is generally about doctor helped self destruction, the truth of the matter is that the patients are as yet commiting self destruction. In the event that an individual who is of sound psyche and can simply decide, assuming that they are introducing self-destructive considerations, policing each option to mediate the endeavor. In the event that that is the situation with regular individuals, for what reason would it be a good idea for it be any unique for individuals who are wiped out and in the clinic. Assuming that equivalent individual who was wiped out was out on the planet, and came dependent upon somebody and requested that that individual assist with committing suicide since they basically don’t have any desire to live any longer, the individual most likely wouldn’t help them.

During the late eighteenth 100 years, “The dismissal of self destruction and killing stayed firm, even after large numbers of the new states decriminalized self destruction following the Progressive Conflict. Most of Americans dismissed self destruction’s precedent-based regulation discipline… yet regardless of how thoughtful they were toward the self destruction’s family, most Americans halted far shy of approving self-murder. As late as the before the war period there existed in the US a firm agreement… against self destruction and kindness killing.” (Dowbiggin)

In 1999, a case is Michigan sentenced Jack Kevorkian, MD, of homicide. He was the essential consideration doctor for Thomas Youk. Youk was a patient of Jack Kevorkian in 1998. Michigan examiners contended that the doctor regulated a deadly portion of an obscure medication after the patient readily marked a record expressing that is what he believed the doctor should do. After the patient’s demise, Kevorkian was accused of doctor helped self destruction, and first degree murder. Kevorkian’s lawyers contended that the doctor was simply attempting to facilitate the aggravation of the patient. This made the appointed authority decide for the doctor. The phys

This question has been answered.

Get Answer