EPAS and practice behaviors
incorporate feedback you have received from your instructor on previous assignments and create a recorded presentation of approximately 15 slides. This presentation includes work you have previously done, which you will revise and convert to slides and narration. Further, the presentation will include a focus on an evaluation strategy for the newly established services to people who are homeless.
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following EPAS and practice behaviors:
C4: Engage In Practice-informed Research and Research-informed Practice
C4.GP.A Use practice experience and theory to inform scientific inquiry and research.
C4.GP.B Apply critical thinking to engage in analysis of quantitative and qualitative research methods and research findings.
C9.GP.A Select and use appropriate methods for evaluation of outcomes.
C9.GP.C Critically analyze, monitor, and evaluate intervention and program processes and outcomes.
Instructions
Include the following in your presentation. Use the titles below for the headings of each section. The number of slides indicated for each section are suggestions.
Introduction (1 slide).
Provide a brief overview of the presentation.
Intervention Strategies (1 slide).
Explain the intervention strategies that will be offered at the shelter.
Synthesis of Literature (2 slides).
Explain the process of refining a research problem into a measurable research question.
Provide a synthesis of the best practices literature from the literature review. Be sure to summarize and evaluate the literature and explain the contributions each could make to the proposed study.
Potential Participants (1 slide).
Identify the potential research participants, including explanation for the choice.
Methods (2 slides).
Explain the methods you would use in your proposed study, including justification.
Data Collection (2 slides).
Explain the sources and methods of data collection.
Data Analysis (2 slides).
Explain how data will be analyzed.
Limitations (1 slide).
Describe any limitations that can be foreseen in the proposed study.
Dissemination Plan (2 slides).
Describe the primary audience and dissemination plan for the results.
Conclusion (1 slide).
Summarize the proposed study.
Evaluate the potential for further study of the research problem.
Sample Solution
legitimate tactics according to proportionality and military necessity. It depends on the magnitude of how much damage done to one another, in order to judge the actions after a war. For example, one cannot simply nuke the terrorist groups throughout the middle-east, because it is not only proportional, it will damage the whole population, an unintended consequence. More importantly, the soldiers must have the right intention in what they are going to achieve, sacrificing the costs to their actions. For example: if soldiers want to execute all prisoners of war, they must do it for the right intention and for a just cause, proportional to the harm done to them. This is supported by Vittola: ‘not always lawful to execute all combatants…we must take account… scale of the injury inflicted by the enemy.’ This is further supported by Frowe approach, which is a lot more moral than Vittola’s view but implies the same agendas: ‘can’t be punished simply for fighting.’ This means one cannot simply punish another because they have been a combatant. They must be treated as humanely as possible. However, the situation is escalated if killing them can lead to peace and security, within the interests of all parties.
Overall, jus in bello suggests in wars, harm can only be used against combatants, never against the innocent. But in the end, the aim is to establish peace and security within the commonwealth. As Vittola’s conclusion: ‘the pursuit of justice for which he fights and the defence of his homeland’ is what nations should be fighting for in wars (Begby et al (2006b), Page 332). Thus, although today’s world has developed, we can see not much different from the modernist accounts on warfare and the traditionists, giving another section of the theory of the just war. Nevertheless, we can still conclude that there cannot be one definitive theory of the just war theory because of its normativity.