Reflect on the healthcare product or service solution you have proposed for your healthcare organization. Consider expenses (including start-up expenses
and any capital expenditures) that will be required to implement your product or service.
Reflect on the estimated revenues (if any) that your proposed solution will generate. If your project does not generate a direct revenue source, consider cost
avoidance, or cost savings as an alternate potential revenue source.
Reflect on the need for financing to meet the estimated expenses associated with your idea.
For each of the above, consult with your internal financial counselor as needed.
ESTIMATING EXPENSES
Conduct an analysis of estimated expenses and revenues associated with your product or service idea by completing the following:
Part 1: Expense/Revenue/ROI Analysis:
Open your Excel Assignment Workbook and navigate to the “W4A3 Estimated Expenses” worksheet. Using the Healthcare Budget Request Guide for
guidance, create a worksheet that records the following:
Each of the estimated expenses associated with your proposed idea, including startup expenses. Be sure to label each appropriately, with enough
descriiption to make it clear what the item is and what the estimated cost involves.
Each of the estimated revenues associated with your proposed idea. Be sure to label each appropriately, with enough descriiption to make it clear what the
item is and any necessary details regarding sources of revenues (including reimbursements).
Calculate the total estimated expenses and revenues for the next 5-year period.
Calculate the Return on Investment (ROI) for your proposed idea.
NOTE: You will copy your worksheet and analysis onto the Healthcare Budget Request Template (Word document) for submission.
Part 2: W4A3 Projected Expenses and Revenues (Five Year) Summary of Analysis and Interpretation of Results:
Create a brief (1- to 2-page) descriiption of your analysis that clearly describes the estimated financial impact of your proposed idea. Interpret the results by
explaining what your ROI calculation means to the organization. Place your analysis on the Healthcare Budget Request Template under the section titled
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK4Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
amage done to each other, to pass judgment on the activities after a conflict. For instance, one can’t just nuke the fear based oppressor bunches all through the center east, since it isn’t just corresponding, it will harm the entire populace, a potentially negative result. All the more significantly, the fighters should have the right aim in the thing they will accomplish, forfeiting the expenses for their activities. For instance: if troopers have any desire to execute all detainees of war, they should do it for the right expectation and for a worthy motivation, corresponding to the mischief done to them. This is upheld by Vittola: ‘not generally legitimate to execute all warriors… we should consider… size of the injury incurred by the foe.’ This is additionally upheld by Frowe approach, which is significantly more upright than Vittola’s view yet suggests similar plans: ‘can’t be rebuffed basically for battling.’ This implies one can’t just rebuff another in light of the fact that they have been a soldier. They should be treated as altruistically as could really be expected. In any case, the circumstance is heightened on the off chance that killing them can prompt harmony and security, inside the interests, everything being equal. By and large, jus in bello proposes in wars, mischief must be utilized against soldiers, never against the blameless. However, eventually, the point is to lay out harmony and security inside the region. As Vittola’s decision: ‘the quest for equity for which he battles and the protection of his country’ is the thing countries ought to be battling for in wars (Begby et al (2006b), Page 332). Hence, albeit the present world has created, we can see not vastly different from the pioneer accounts on fighting and the traditionists, giving one more part of the hypothesis of the simply war. By the by, we can in any case reason that there can’t be one authoritative hypothesis of the simply war hypothesis as a result of its normativity.
Jus post bellum
At last, jus post bellum proposes that the moves we ought to initiate after a conflict (Frowe (2010), Page 208). Vittola, right off the bat, contends after a conflict, it is the obligation of the pioneer to judge how to manage the foe (Begby et al (2006b), Page 332).. Once more, proportionality is accentuated. For instance, the Versailles settlement forced after WWI is tentatively excessively unforgiving, as it was not all Germany’s problem for the conflict. This is upheld by Frowe, who communicates two perspectives in jus post bellum: Moderation and Maximalism, which are very contrasting perspectives. Minimalists recommend a more merciful methodology while maximalist, supporting the above model, gives a crueler methodology, rebuffing the foe both financially and strategically (Frowe (2010), Page 208). At the last occurrence, notwithstanding, the point of war is to lay out harmony security, so whatever should be done can be ethically legitimate, assuming that it observes the guidelines of jus promotion bellum. All in all, simply war hypothesis is entirely contestable and can contend in various ways. Notwithstanding, the foundation of an equitable harmony is pivotal, making all war type circumstance to have various approaches to drawing nearer (Frowe (2010), Page 227). In any case, the simply war hypothesis contains jus promotion bellum, jus in bello and jus