Ethical corporate thinking and actions in the IT industry

General frameworks for ethical corporate thinking and actions in the IT industry have also been covered in the prior weeks. In preparation for your remaining written assignments in the second half of this course, let’s take a bit of a closer look at the relationship between ethics and moral standards, and how attitudes about the interplay between these two standards have changed over time.
Keep in mind that these standards regulate what is considered right or wrong conduct or behavior. Appendix A provides insight into various views on morality. Review and select one of the moralities discussed in the Appendix to refer to as you respond to the following items:
The moralities selected was: Relativism
• After all this time, why is it still a struggle to provide a universally common ethical standard that would be globally (or even locally) accepted?
• Share your thoughts on your selection and your opinion of where society is today in terms of moral attitudes.
• Provide a short description of what the morality you selected from your reading suggests about the way we should live our lives and make decisions.

 

 

 

Sample Solution

Ethical corporate thinking and actions in the IT industry

Moral relativism is the view that moral judgments are true of false only relative to some particular standpoint and that no standpoint is uniquely privileged over all others. It has often been associated with other claims about morality: notably, the thesis that different cultures exhibit radically different moral values, the denial that there are universal moral values shared by every human society. Over the years moral relativism has attracted a great deal of criticism, and not just from professional philosophers. One reason for this, of course, is that it is widely perceived to be a way of thinking that is on the rise. Another reason is that a relativistic view of morality is thought by many to have pernicious consequences. For example, Pope Benedict XVI blamed it for the riots that had taken place in Britain, arguing that when policies do not presume or promote objective values, the resulting moral relativism tends instead to produce frustration, despair, and a disregard for the life and liberty of others (National Catholic Reporter, September, 12, 2011).

oing now to training, organizations normally see the training process as a systematic approach to developing and enhancing the skills and capabilities of the workers in a way that would add value to the organization. According to Gerber (2000) the complex nature of the business in the twenty first century calls for highly qualified and competent workforces. Furthermore, Gerber (2000) claimed that work has become more demanding and requiring for a ‘smarter’ workforce. Consequently, the organization may respond to these external pressures by harnessing the skills and capabilities of the workforces, which may be achieved by designing and facilitating training programs for the workforces.

Fundamentally, effective training programs and approaches would guarantee that organization’s workforces are equipped with the appropriate knowledge and information to efficiently perform their tasks (Acton & Golden 2003). Subsequently, trained and efficient workforces tend to produce better results than workforces that have not undergone training. Resultantly, overall productivity and efficiency may be improved and sustained on a long-term basis. Moreover, organizations also rely on training to cascade new initiatives. For example, organizations attempting to introduce new concepts, such as total quality management (TQM) and other programs tend to conduct training sessions to introduce the new concept to the members of the organization. In addition, organizations extract benefits from conducting trainings among staffs. Acton and Golden (2003) explained that providing training opportunities to employees help in: increasing employee satisfaction; increasing sense of belongingness and benefits; improving employee commitment to the organization; updating of skills; and strengthening the organization’s competitiveness. In relation, commonly used training techniques include audio-visual based training, computer-based training, electronic performance support system, and the distance, Internet-based training (Acton and Golden 2003). Organizations normally use a combination of these approaches to enforce learning.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.