Search the web for ethical standards in the Human Services field, then find at least 5 Scriptures describing how
we should treat others and care for them. Compare and contrast the Human Service ethics standards with
biblical standards. How are they alike? How are they different?
Ethical Standards
The fundamental ethical values of the human services profession include respecting the dignity and welfare of all people, promoting self-determination, honoring cultural diversity, advocating for social justice, and acting with integrity, honesty, genuineness and objectivity. Human service professionals consider these standards in ethical and professional making. With looking at ethical standards, God is at the center point of putting these in places because He wants to protect His children. The ethical standard that needs to be discussed is to treat everyone with worth no matter what culture they have come from or where they are in life (1 Corinthians 12:12-14). The difference between scripture and the standards of ethics is that people will look through the eye of man to judge people who come from different cultures.
environmental synergies. An effective program means that some design ideas are reducing this consumption and emissions in this way. The author mentioned that human ecological design proactively interfaces people with environments by constructing a built environment. By implementing, the human experience is within the space and place. The details that obtain meaning from the whole, human ecological design establishes new spaces, their sense of place and their environmental interfaces. According to the theory of Human Ecological Design, the design and construction of the buildings we live, work and rebuild, profoundly affect human experience, health, well-being and the environment steady (Caplan, 2016). By considering human needs and sustainable design concepts, this approach can better play the role and purpose of architecture for human design. The architectural theory of sustainable technology connects the relationship between people and the relationship between architecture and the natural environment. When integrated with the design process, these factors can positively impact the design’s results.
In conclusion, the theory and direction of interior space design are based on human
needs and the importance of perception and cognition of space and place design. In order to obtain more profound theoretical research results and better design projects, designers still need further research and practice to get an accurate basis; however, as seen in the experience presented thesis, designers have a good start on the space, place meaning and design.
Rapoport, A. (1970). The study of spatial quality. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 4(4), 81-95.
Lidwell, W., Holden, K., & Butler, J. (2010). Universal principles of design: 125 ways to enhance usability, influence perception, increase appeal, make better design decisions, and teach through design. Beverly, Mass: Rockport Publishers.
Ganoe, C. J. (1999). Design as narrative: A theory of inhabiting interior space. Journal of Interior Design, 25(2), 1-15. doi:10.1111/j.1939-1668.1999.tb00340.x
Caplan, B. (2016). Buildings are for people: Human ecological design. Chicago: Libri Publishing.
INDS-706
Sylvia Han
Pro. Gray
Winter 2019
Argument Paper 2 In this argument paper, I would like to discuss that the social theory’s function of humans and society plays an essential role in the design of social theory in the direction of indoor space. The purpose of the design is to solve these seemingly simple questions – “Is this useful for these people?” and “Is this solution better than this?” Therefore, through simpler problems, it reflects the problems that interior design needs to solve and causes people to think. For example, Interior designers need to use critical thinking and design methods that combine user needs to design interior programs. Some theories fact are reflected in interior design, such as the way of thinking, understanding direction and critical logic. Based on designers’ thinking, it is essential that the art, design and gestalt theories support and influence of theory on the expertise of design projects. Designers want to mention critical thinking. The author Eidson, Patricia L, an outstanding scholar in the field of interior design and architectural design, mentioned in his article that critical thinking is a dualistic concept that couples modes of designing with certain theories of criticism. Theoretical and historical ideas that influenced changes in interior design and architecture are presented in a timeline context to illustrate the aspects of evaluating, interpreting and describing, which are parts o