Sample Solution

members collaborate, share information, solve differences and find ways to satisfy each other Compromising: In this style, the individuals show moderate concern for self and for other others. All the Individuals of a team settle on a middle ground, where each one of them has to give something and take something Obliging: Individuals show high concern for others and show a low self-concern. They try to understand other party’s opinions and satisfy their needs. These people are ready to make concessions in a conflicting situation. Avoiding: Individuals have low self-concern and also low concern for others. Individuals hide their disagreements and avoid confrontations with other party involved in the conflict Forcing/ Dominating: Individuals have high concern for their own self and are least concerned about others. This type of individuals put all efforts to obtain favorable solutions for their self-interests regardless of others. The Relation between team roles and conflict management styles Each team member uses a different conflict management style regarding the way in which they want to approach a problem. The following describes different team roles and their conflict management styles. (Aritzeta, Ayestaran & Swailes, 2005) Completer: These individuals correlate avoiding and obliging styles for conflict management. Individuals who are completers are self-controlled and submissive. This team role does not have a forceful behavior, so they are more likely to have a negative correlation with dominating style. Implementers: These individuals correlate integrative, avoiding and compromising conflict management style. Implementors are systematic and controlled but at times they are also defined as being uncompromising and conventional. These individuals oppose new ideas