Evaluating a Collective Bargaining Agreement

 

Describe how this is similar to a “contract” between management and labor. Do you believe it is written at the
correct level of detail (e.g., is it too vague and therefore needing more specific details, or is it broad enough for
logical interpretation)? Provide several specific examples.
Do you believe this document adds value to a workplace, or does it create restrictions? Please explain.

Sample Solution

Evaluating a Collective Bargaining Agreement

A Collective Bargaining Agreement [C.B.A], is a written legal contract between an employer and a union representing the employees. The Collective Bargaining Agreement is the result of an extensive negotiation process between the parties regarding topics such as wages, hours, and terms and conditions of employment. A labor management contract is an agreement made between the worker and the leadership of a company. A Collective Bargaining Agreement is similar to a labor management contract as the end goal of both is a contract with the employer about those terms. The Collective Bargaining Agreements negotiated in good faith often support higher wages for each worker. Workplace conditions become safer too, as employers and workers are both held accountable for ongoing maintenance and inspection concerns.

When memorizing facts, there are too many to remember. Thus, the focus is not on trying to understand all the facts but trying to remember them all. When multiple memories come to mind at once, they immediately lock into a fierce competition with each other. Memories then fight to be remembered more than the other. “When these memories are tightly competing for our attention the brain steps in and actually modifies those memories,” says Jarrod Lewis-Peacock, a neuroscientist at UT Austin. Once the brain crowns the winner and loser the memory that wins is then strengthens and the loser is weakened and then eventually forgotten about.
Many equate ‘to know’ with ‘to understand’. However, ‘knowing’ something is not the same as ‘understanding’ something. In the allegory of the cave, the prisoners watch the stories that shadows play out, and because the shadows were all they ever got to see, they believed them to be the most real things in the world. But, because they’ve never experienced anything other than the shadows they did not understand that the shadows were just figures of what was really there. Not having an understanding of the outside world caused many difficulties in their society, leading to death.
Many also believe that having access to more information produces more knowledge, which will result in more wisdom. In the essay “Wisdom in the Age of Information and the Importance of Storytelling in Making Sense of the World” Maria Popova states, “We believe that having access to more information produces more knowledge, which results in more wisdom. But, if anything, the opposite is true — more and more information without the proper context and interpretation only muddles our understanding of the world rather than enriching it.” For example, many people get upset at the sight of others staring at their phones or taking pictures, it is from a lack of understanding that technology feeds our primitive desires like connection and belonging.
In all, gaining knowledge should be based on not just memorizing facts. Gaining knowledge should be based on desire, and wanting to learn. One must understand that the brain cannot secure information by just quickly reading over something without understanding what it going on throughout the text.

About Essay Sauce

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.