Using the course texts as a basis for your discussion, write a thesis-driven essay that answers the to either of
the following questions:
A. Develop the relevance of the course texts to the “background practices” that make up your own, personal
being-in-the-world (Links to an external site.). If a course text no longer speaks to our background practices,
explain why.
“The task of the craftsperson in not to generate the meaning (of the world; a significant life), but rather to
cultivate in one’s self the skill for discerning the meanings that are already there (in the world).” (All Things
Shining. 209. My edit.)
Suggested themes of still relevant background practices reflected in the texts:
• Homer: moods, shared great events, remembrance of greatness of tales told/remembered.
• Homer: excellence across worlds (i.e., how Odysseus is polymetis)
• Aeschylus: Familial loyalty/vengeance versus duty to the state/justice.
• Aeschylus: passions/emotion v. reason/disinterestedness.
• Plato: Socrates and the conflict between knowledge and opinion in the polis.
• Augustine: Excellence consists in renouncing what is bodily/desire (i.e., the flesh) and embracing the
immateriality and goodness of God as the face of ultimate reality. The significance of one’s autobiography (first
person account of inwardness; otherwise private) before God.
• Dante: Punishment for not renouncing one’s will. Classification of the severity of sin.
effective in improving and enhancing reciprocal interactions among children with autism and their typical peers (McGee et al., 1992).
Incidental teaching is the most common among speech and verbal words and phrases. It is proven to help a child engage with toys, respond in social settings, social tolerance of peers, and imitation of peers (McGee et al., 1999). Hart and Risley (1975) discussed that children were able to develop compound sentences on their own based on the teaching procedures of incidental teaching. Incidental teaching encourages the use of conversational language because of the use in generalized settings with different people (McGee & Daly, 2007).
It is evident how successful incidental teaching is in the realm of functional language interactions. However, McGee, Krantz, and McClannahan (1986) completed an extension of incidental teaching procedures of Hart and Risley (1975) to teach reading instruction for autistic children. The study consisted of two autistic children, one who was five years old, and another who was thirteen years old (McGee et al., 1986). The study used visual discriminations of printed stimuli in response to auditory cues within the activity and the measurements were based on maintenance of sight-word reading s