Flattery Compliments
Please write a short literature review about compliments for the categories listed below. Sources have been provided. You can use the abstracts of the articles for content of each compliment category.
1. Flattery
- Chan, E., & Sengupta, J. (2013). Observing flattery: A social comparison perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(4), 740–758. https://doi.org/10.1086/672357 Danziger, R. (2020). The pragmatics of flattery: The strategic use of solidarity-oriented actions. Journal of Pragmatics, 170, 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.027
- Jakubowska, J., Filip, A., & Białecka-Pikul, M. (2021). The coin that is most current is flattery? Stability and discontinuity of false praise-telling from 5 to 7 years of life. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105128
- Johnson, D., Gardner, J., & Wiles, J. (2004). Experience as a moderator of the media equation: The impact of flattery and praise. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(3), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.12.008
regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it's anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are 'recoded' and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller's unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pieces of data that can be put away in prompt (present moment) memory, how much data inside every one of those lumps can be very high, without unfavorably influencing the review of similar number